Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I am in this situation. We have two homes, so are able to live apart, and it has been the biggest blessing not to have him around all the time. I don't have the energy to go through a potentially messy divorce until the kid leaves for college. The current setup works for everyone. The unusual thing in our situation is that we have not separated our finances. I manage everything and he is very frugal, so it works.

Thank you. what do you think would be messy about the divorce that you prefer to wait/avoid until kid is in college?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We married young, have grown children and grandchildren and retired early. We have gradually reached the point of living entirely separate lives but with no plans (that I know of) of ever getting divorced. We rarely if ever spend any time together unless we are with our kids and grandkids or visiting relatives or going out with old friends. Everyone has a good sense of where we are with this and we don't really hide it -- but we don't talk much about it with other people either.

We have two houses and one of us spends the bulk of our time in one and the other vice-versa, but when we're all together and space is at a premium we will sleep in the same bed.

We travel separately and sometimes for several weeks at a time.

We communicate largely by text and largely just to coordinate family activities (we are both very close with all of our kids, who are all local) and to arrange the occasional outing with friends.

We aren't rich but have enough not to worry (net worth $9 million) and we have similar approaches to money and trust each other on that issue so there's no problem there.

I suppose if we were younger we'd divorce, but since neither of us has any interest in another partner and are fine being "single" forever there's just no need to. We don't fight and we respect each other enough that this works for us pretty easily.

how old are you and the spouse?

we're now in our early 60s. but our arrangement isn't new.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We married young, have grown children and grandchildren and retired early. We have gradually reached the point of living entirely separate lives but with no plans (that I know of) of ever getting divorced. We rarely if ever spend any time together unless we are with our kids and grandkids or visiting relatives or going out with old friends. Everyone has a good sense of where we are with this and we don't really hide it -- but we don't talk much about it with other people either.

We have two houses and one of us spends the bulk of our time in one and the other vice-versa, but when we're all together and space is at a premium we will sleep in the same bed.

We travel separately and sometimes for several weeks at a time.

We communicate largely by text and largely just to coordinate family activities (we are both very close with all of our kids, who are all local) and to arrange the occasional outing with friends.

We aren't rich but have enough not to worry (net worth $9 million) and we have similar approaches to money and trust each other on that issue so there's no problem there.

I suppose if we were younger we'd divorce, but since neither of us has any interest in another partner and are fine being "single" forever there's just no need to. We don't fight and we respect each other enough that this works for us pretty easily.

how old are you and the spouse?

Anonymous wrote:We married young, have grown children and grandchildren and retired early. We have gradually reached the point of living entirely separate lives but with no plans (that I know of) of ever getting divorced. We rarely if ever spend any time together unless we are with our kids and grandkids or visiting relatives or going out with old friends. Everyone has a good sense of where we are with this and we don't really hide it -- but we don't talk much about it with other people either.

We have two houses and one of us spends the bulk of our time in one and the other vice-versa, but when we're all together and space is at a premium we will sleep in the same bed.

We travel separately and sometimes for several weeks at a time.

We communicate largely by text and largely just to coordinate family activities (we are both very close with all of our kids, who are all local) and to arrange the occasional outing with friends.

We aren't rich but have enough not to worry (net worth $9 million) and we have similar approaches to money and trust each other on that issue so there's no problem there.

I suppose if we were younger we'd divorce, but since neither of us has any interest in another partner and are fine being "single" forever there's just no need to. We don't fight and we respect each other enough that this works for us pretty easily.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"It's cheaper to keep her" but that doesn't mean you have to keep her around.

I have a not-quite-ex. We've lived separately for years. We have school-aged kids, and it would've been catastrophic to them if ex and I had split the money and tried to figure out how to make two full, separate households work. One of us went to a rented room, the other got custody and stayed with the kids in their childhood home. Non-custodial parent sees the kids weekly; they're not estranged (they just didn't want to parent, which is a large part of the marital breakdown). It's a delicate balance, but it works for us, for now. We'll file and finish the paperwork once the kids are grown and flown. I'll never get back with my ex, but we're probably happier now than either of us were for most of our coupled-up marriage.

I don't know why some people judge this approach so harshly. It gives a great cooling off period and limits the financial fsckedupedness. Not everyone can do this, and it does require logistics wrangling that can be a problem if there's active conflict between the parents. For us, though, it's the best possible almost-resolution (for now).

I have a similar situation to this in terms of root causes of separation. I am assuming divorce bc he will want to date again and I imagine that’s gonna be an issue for the ladies he will end up seeing if he’s not divorced. (For my part I am not worried about my status.) how do you all manage new relationships given the legal and financial ties you still have?

Anonymous wrote:"It's cheaper to keep her" but that doesn't mean you have to keep her around.

I have a not-quite-ex. We've lived separately for years. We have school-aged kids, and it would've been catastrophic to them if ex and I had split the money and tried to figure out how to make two full, separate households work. One of us went to a rented room, the other got custody and stayed with the kids in their childhood home. Non-custodial parent sees the kids weekly; they're not estranged (they just didn't want to parent, which is a large part of the marital breakdown). It's a delicate balance, but it works for us, for now. We'll file and finish the paperwork once the kids are grown and flown. I'll never get back with my ex, but we're probably happier now than either of us were for most of our coupled-up marriage.

I don't know why some people judge this approach so harshly. It gives a great cooling off period and limits the financial fsckedupedness. Not everyone can do this, and it does require logistics wrangling that can be a problem if there's active conflict between the parents. For us, though, it's the best possible almost-resolution (for now).

Anonymous wrote:NP. I am in this situation. We have two homes, so are able to live apart, and it has been the biggest blessing not to have him around all the time. I don't have the energy to go through a potentially messy divorce until the kid leaves for college. The current setup works for everyone. The unusual thing in our situation is that we have not separated our finances. I manage everything and he is very frugal, so it works.