Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Williams and Amherst, and many other SLACS, are fantastic schools but they would rank lower than any of the Ivies in a head to head competition due to the lack of comparable science and engineering resources. They aren't really comparable which is why they are separately ranked.
Yes, and they would beat the Ivies for quality of UG education. Agree they are apples and oranges.
'Anonymous wrote:At the bottom. There’s no reason Dartmouth isn’t better than both and Dartmouth is not even a top Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Williams and Amherst, and many other SLACS, are fantastic schools but they would rank lower than any of the Ivies in a head to head competition due to the lack of comparable science and engineering resources. They aren't really comparable which is why they are separately ranked.
Yes, and they would beat the Ivies for quality of UG education. Agree they are apples and oranges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Williams and Amherst, and many other SLACS, are fantastic schools but they would rank lower than any of the Ivies in a head to head competition due to the lack of comparable science and engineering resources. They aren't really comparable which is why they are separately ranked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Williams and Amherst, and many other SLACS, are fantastic schools but they would rank lower than any of the Ivies in a head to head competition due to the lack of comparable science and engineering resources. They aren't really comparable which is why they are separately ranked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Williams and Amherst, and many other SLACS, are fantastic schools but they would rank lower than any of the Ivies in a head to head competition due to the lack of comparable science and engineering resources. They aren't really comparable which is why they are separately ranked.
Anonymous wrote:Sure, I guess. But with such extraordinarily selective schools, who really cares?
Anonymous wrote:how would you rank overall based on the following - overall prestige, quality of undergraduate instruction, outcomes, quality of life, social. I’d wedge them in as follows:
Harvard, Yale, Princeton > Williams > Columbia, Dartmouth > Amherst > Brown, Cornell