Anonymous wrote:You’re not “just curious.” You’re clearly upset your kid didn’t get in.
Anonymous wrote:Straight As is meaningless given how easy it is to get there. And there are a ton of kids with MAP scores in that range. Clearly an impressive kid, but unfortunately not unique or special.
Anonymous wrote:Straight As is meaningless given how easy it is to get there. And there are a ton of kids with MAP scores in that range. Clearly an impressive kid, but unfortunately not unique or special.
Anonymous wrote:You’re not “just curious.” You’re clearly upset your kid didn’t get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Nothing is a guarantee. Especially if the committee thinks the application is written by a striver mom, not the kid.
"290+" is a mid score, unless that "+" is doing a lot of work.
Or the committee thinks that the test score was lucky and not consistent with the rest of performance across other areas of evaluation.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Nothing is a guarantee. Especially if the committee thinks the application is written by a striver mom, not the kid.
"290+" is a mid score, unless that "+" is doing a lot of work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious...
Results aren't even out, man.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious...
Anonymous wrote:Just curious...