Having a ton of kids is something that the very rich and very poor do and the middle class avoid…but it’s acceptable if you’re rich but not if you’re poor. Being unemployed is like this too. Same with being inbred.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow guess billionaires are into breeding heavy but always thought having lots of kids was a rural or characteristic of poorer people/ areas.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/chinese-billionaire-fathered-more-100-120000886.html

No -- poor people just get judged for it.

Because they are ill equipped financially and emotionally to take care of all their kids and rely on handouts. Having a large family is the new flex for the wealthy. Having just two kids is very middle class.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its polarizing. There used to be huge families in the 50s in every socio-economic group. This also helped fuel the housing industry, those bigger ranch style houses etc.

But mostly its either very poor or very rich people who have 5 or more kids, most folks max out around 2-4

hmmm, I wonder what happened in the late 1950’s to allow families to have smaller families and to allow more families to choose the number of children they wanted.

It was the post war economic boom that caused bigger families and yes, birth control limited them. Are you being smug & do you assume we know nothing about history?

You forgot about legal marital rape

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its polarizing. There used to be huge families in the 50s in every socio-economic group. This also helped fuel the housing industry, those bigger ranch style houses etc.

But mostly its either very poor or very rich people who have 5 or more kids, most folks max out around 2-4

hmmm, I wonder what happened in the late 1950’s to allow families to have smaller families and to allow more families to choose the number of children they wanted.

It was the post war economic boom that caused bigger families and yes, birth control limited them. Are you being smug & do you assume we know nothing about history?

Anonymous wrote:Its polarizing. There used to be huge families in the 50s in every socio-economic group. This also helped fuel the housing industry, those bigger ranch style houses etc.

But mostly its either very poor or very rich people who have 5 or more kids, most folks max out around 2-4

hmmm, I wonder what happened in the late 1950’s to allow families to have smaller families and to allow more families to choose the number of children they wanted.

Its polarizing. There used to be huge families in the 50s in every socio-economic group. This also helped fuel the housing industry, those bigger ranch style houses etc.

But mostly its either very poor or very rich people who have 5 or more kids, most folks max out around 2-4

The tables have turned on the number of kids you should have. Middle and lower class people know they can’t afford kids so the rich are having dozens as it a a sign of wealth.

Anonymous wrote:Wow guess billionaires are into breeding heavy but always thought having lots of kids was a rural or characteristic of poorer people/ areas.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/chinese-billionaire-fathered-more-100-120000886.html

No -- poor people just get judged for it.

Anonymous wrote:No it's about breeding your "kind"

Elon Musk breeding what he thinks of as white Christian men.

Peter Theil only wants white Christian males he's gay. He will just force your DD's to breed.

Stephen Miller same but oh dear his wife is Jewish of course he failed.

I wonder where Elon’s sperm actually comes from. I don’t think he’s actually having PIV with any of the baby mommas. He’s probably genetically engineered something.

^^ here you go:

Official Children: He had four sons with his primary wife, Börte, who became heirs: Jochi, Chagatai, Ögedei, and Tolui, along with several daughters.
Concubines & Wives: He took many more wives and hundreds of concubines during his conquests, fathering numerous other children who were not in the direct line of succession.
Genetic Legacy: A famous 2003 genetic study found that about 16 million men in Asia (roughly 0.5% of the world's male population) are likely direct descendants of Genghis Khan, demonstrating the vastness of his progeny.
Uncertain Numbers: The exact total number of his children is unknown because records for those from concubines were not kept, but estimates range from several hundred to over 1,000.

Rural and poor?

You must never have heard of Genghis Khan.

What bot keeps dropping yahoo articles like there is a point to them? What idiots are answering?

No it's about breeding your "kind"

Elon Musk breeding what he thinks of as white Christian men.

Peter Theil only wants white Christian males he's gay. He will just force your DD's to breed.

Stephen Miller same but oh dear his wife is Jewish of course he failed.

Also, this guy:

https://www.wsj.com/world/pavel-durov-children-fertility-sperm-donation-3d6d5231?st=xbNa41&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

Wow guess billionaires are into breeding heavy but always thought having lots of kids was a rural or characteristic of poorer people/ areas.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/chinese-billionaire-fathered-more-100-120000886.html