Anonymous wrote:What you need to get into these competitive schools at the high school level is some type of spike, meaning some extra curricular that makes him very unique: star athlete with recruitment potential, math/science olympiad super star, sibling/ legacy/ VIP. If any of these are met, then the school mostly cares that your child can handle the rigor of their academics. In that case, an 85% is more than enough.
If it's any help, my daughter scored in 98th percentile a few years ago and did not get into any of the most competitive schools (Potomac, NCS, Sidwell, GDS). She had excellent grades at school and interviewed well, but she did not have anything else that made her standout. She played some rec sports, did some volunteering here and there ... don't get me wrong. She's a great kid and we are proud of her, but in the eyes of an admissions officer who is trying to select 30 kids from a pool of 500, she had nothing that made her standout. The kids in her grade who got in did.
Hope that puts things into perspective for you.
Anonymous wrote:My DS scored an 85% on the SSAT. I know testing isn’t the end all be all for admissions and he has solid grades and ECs, but I am curious on how this will be perceived by both moderately and highly competitive schools. Don’t get me wrong, I know this is a good score but most schools are vague with saying what they are looking for. Is it accurate to subtract the school’s acceptance rate from 100 to gauge a target score?
Anonymous wrote:The threshold for boarding schools (Deerfield, Hotchkiss, Choate) is 85th percentile, though exceptions will be made. It's about 93rd percentile for Andover, Exeter. Other factors (top athlete, special talent, URM) could affect that. It's a case-by-case thing. Additionally, sometimes a 98th or 99th percentile is a disadvantage. It might suggest a lack of balance, or that the kid overly prepped, etc. Most schools want very well rounded students who bring something beyond academic prowess to the school. Being good in a sport can help a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about HS, OP? Or do you mean one of the earlier levels of the SSAT?
HS. From what I know, most kids applying for MS take the ISSE rather than the middle level SSAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you need to get into these competitive schools at the high school level is some type of spike, meaning some extra curricular that makes him very unique: star athlete with recruitment potential, math/science olympiad super star, sibling/ legacy/ VIP. If any of these are met, then the school mostly cares that your child can handle the rigor of their academics. In that case, an 85% is more than enough.
If it's any help, my daughter scored in 98th percentile a few years ago and did not get into any of the most competitive schools (Potomac, NCS, Sidwell, GDS). She had excellent grades at school and interviewed well, but she did not have anything else that made her standout. She played some rec sports, did some volunteering here and there ... don't get me wrong. She's a great kid and we are proud of her, but in the eyes of an admissions officer who is trying to select 30 kids from a pool of 500, she had nothing that made her standout. The kids in her grade who got in did.
Hope that puts things into perspective for you.
This was our experience as well.
Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about HS, OP? Or do you mean one of the earlier levels of the SSAT?
Anonymous wrote:What you need to get into these competitive schools at the high school level is some type of spike, meaning some extra curricular that makes him very unique: star athlete with recruitment potential, math/science olympiad super star, sibling/ legacy/ VIP. If any of these are met, then the school mostly cares that your child can handle the rigor of their academics. In that case, an 85% is more than enough.
If it's any help, my daughter scored in 98th percentile a few years ago and did not get into any of the most competitive schools (Potomac, NCS, Sidwell, GDS). She had excellent grades at school and interviewed well, but she did not have anything else that made her standout. She played some rec sports, did some volunteering here and there ... don't get me wrong. She's a great kid and we are proud of her, but in the eyes of an admissions officer who is trying to select 30 kids from a pool of 500, she had nothing that made her standout. The kids in her grade who got in did.
Hope that puts things into perspective for you.