Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Yeah, no. That’s how real people who actually read, read. I don’t sit on the beach with Faulkner, and neither do you.
Ha! Actually I do. I have a PhD in Literature and I'm a writer by profession, so we differ hugely. I also don't sit on beaches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Because it appears to be entirely "curated" in order to garner approval from naive people, such as yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Yeah, no. That’s how real people who actually read, read. I don’t sit on the beach with Faulkner, and neither do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads.
Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
How so? It's omnivorism, which is to be expected in any credible arbiter of taste. It doesn't undermine the list, it is necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.