Anonymous wrote:I have high achieving kids. I don't think FCPS cares about them (equity), but they have had some individual teachers who do (and also some who don't).
Anonymous wrote:No, I think the whole this is one self serving mess.
I think the SB makes decisions that are almost completely self serving and political in nature, doing things that will help them move up in the political system (moving to local and state gov't positions), these usually do not align with putting children first. I think Reid is the tool that they use to do these things.
I think gatehouse is full of people trying to justify their high pay and job titles. They are constantly reinventing school policies to keep themselves employed, which usually does not align with putting children first.
I think the schools are full of Principals that want to move up the FCPS hierarchy, and create local policies that will make themselves look good so that they can beef up their resume to move on to gatehouse.
And I think there are teachers that are tired of all of the self serving nonsense that is being put in place by the people who are in charge and have checked out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:See subject. I’m not talking about individual teachers. I’m talking about whether the system is set up to care about students as humans as opposed to widgets.
Should FCPS only care about providing a teacher who teaches focuses solely on academics ignoring also other aspects (eg, behavior, personal issues) or should it care only about getting kids out the door in 12th grade regardless of grades?
Should it care about students welfare out side of school or their mental health?
If a parent sees a problem outside of school that may impact what happens inside of school, should they bother keeping school/FCPS informed?
If there are issues happening in school (eg, bullying) that may impact what happens at home, should FCPS/school inform the parents?
Is there any institution of more than 200,000 people (students and staff) that has individual interests at heart? Anything that big typically has its own interests and self-preservation at heart. I would go as far to say they don't even have students' educational interests at heart past meeting the bare minimum that they need to do to continue to exist.
That's without judgement - it's just a fact of super large organizations and institutions.
I get that but students should still feel like they are being served. This is why service industry (which on some level is what a school is), sends out surveys asking whether your cashier or rep says hello, did they take time to address your need, etc.?
I think about the dad of the HHS student shot and killed at a soccer park after reporting the issue and expecting some feed back. Instead, the response was the SRO is too busy to care. Did we ever see a report about whether the matter was appropriately handled by the school? Without it, we don’t know.
School seems to be sucking the humanity out of kids. See a kid lying on the floor? “It is not your business, kids” or “what kid on the floor?” School will just tell kids to just step over the body and go on with their day as if nothing is happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:See subject. I’m not talking about individual teachers. I’m talking about whether the system is set up to care about students as humans as opposed to widgets.
Should FCPS only care about providing a teacher who teaches focuses solely on academics ignoring also other aspects (eg, behavior, personal issues) or should it care only about getting kids out the door in 12th grade regardless of grades?
Should it care about students welfare out side of school or their mental health?
If a parent sees a problem outside of school that may impact what happens inside of school, should they bother keeping school/FCPS informed?
If there are issues happening in school (eg, bullying) that may impact what happens at home, should FCPS/school inform the parents?
Is there any institution of more than 200,000 people (students and staff) that has individual interests at heart? Anything that big typically has its own interests and self-preservation at heart. I would go as far to say they don't even have students' educational interests at heart past meeting the bare minimum that they need to do to continue to exist.
That's without judgement - it's just a fact of super large organizations and institutions.
Anonymous wrote:Damn. Are you getting paid for these posts? We should have Jeff check the IP address to see if you're even in Fairfax County.
Anonymous wrote:See subject. I’m not talking about individual teachers. I’m talking about whether the system is set up to care about students as humans as opposed to widgets.
Should FCPS only care about providing a teacher who teaches focuses solely on academics ignoring also other aspects (eg, behavior, personal issues) or should it care only about getting kids out the door in 12th grade regardless of grades?
Should it care about students welfare out side of school or their mental health?
If a parent sees a problem outside of school that may impact what happens inside of school, should they bother keeping school/FCPS informed?
If there are issues happening in school (eg, bullying) that may impact what happens at home, should FCPS/school inform the parents?