Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school does have some things like this, but other things are mentioned to kids themselves and parents are only contacted if their kid indicates interest. If you have a kid that doesn’t always volunteer themselves and/or just doesn’t pay a ton of attention, that’s another possibility. One of my kids is invited to do everything while another is barely cognizant that the activities exist; if it weren’t for kid #1, I’d think opportunities weren’t advertised to the kids themselves… but because of kid #1, I know they are.
OP here, that could be it.
Thanks to the other PPs too. I don’t think the leadership club in this case is code for behavior improvement—I know the kids and they are good kids.
Exclusive clubs are not the same as ability-based, open-through-competition clubs. Teachers inviting certain kids quietly is problematic in elementary in my opinion. Letting kids try and fail is a good exercise. But creating opportunities only for certain kids and quietly/almost secretly is quite another. I don’t know exactly what’s happening though and didn’t want to jump to conclusions.
But the point is that some of the "exclusive clubs" are things that the kids implicitly auditioned for via their classes (DCPS math bowl, DCPS Google competition, Battle of the Books, DCPS 5th Grade All Star Choir). The math instructional coach, the music teacher, etc don't need to do sham auditions, because they already know which kids can do math, read books quickly, sing well, etc. Your kid was eligible and considered, he just didn't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school does have some things like this, but other things are mentioned to kids themselves and parents are only contacted if their kid indicates interest. If you have a kid that doesn’t always volunteer themselves and/or just doesn’t pay a ton of attention, that’s another possibility. One of my kids is invited to do everything while another is barely cognizant that the activities exist; if it weren’t for kid #1, I’d think opportunities weren’t advertised to the kids themselves… but because of kid #1, I know they are.
OP here, that could be it.
Thanks to the other PPs too. I don’t think the leadership club in this case is code for behavior improvement—I know the kids and they are good kids.
Exclusive clubs are not the same as ability-based, open-through-competition clubs. Teachers inviting certain kids quietly is problematic in elementary in my opinion. Letting kids try and fail is a good exercise. But creating opportunities only for certain kids and quietly/almost secretly is quite another. I don’t know exactly what’s happening though and didn’t want to jump to conclusions.
Anonymous wrote:Our school does have some things like this, but other things are mentioned to kids themselves and parents are only contacted if their kid indicates interest. If you have a kid that doesn’t always volunteer themselves and/or just doesn’t pay a ton of attention, that’s another possibility. One of my kids is invited to do everything while another is barely cognizant that the activities exist; if it weren’t for kid #1, I’d think opportunities weren’t advertised to the kids themselves… but because of kid #1, I know they are.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is in 5th and we’ve recently become aware of at least three clubs (mix of sports, arts and general “leadership”) that were either “by invitation” or not at all advertised to the kids. We’ve found out by accident. Do we talk to individual teachers, or someone else at the school? It’s really crappy to exclude kids who are otherwise described as “great friends, inclusive, leaders,” etc. If we were at a private, I’d understand it this seems crazy in upper elementary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leadership club is code for “maybe this will change their behavior.” Don’t feel left out.
This.
Not always. My kids' school has leadership/class representative thing but it's by nomination (from classmates) and selection by the teacher. It's definitely not for the kids with the behavioral problems.
If you're feeling left out that your kid wasn't included, just find out who the faculty member in charge is and ask if there's room. And consider the possibility that your kid may not be a good fit, your kid may not be quite ready for it, or your kid may not have even wanted to do the activity.
I am happy any time DCPS is doing something to recognize higher skills in kids. Not everything needs to be open to everyone and slowed down to the pace of the least able child. I wish DCPS would do more of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leadership club is code for “maybe this will change their behavior.” Don’t feel left out.
This.
Not always. My kids' school has leadership/class representative thing but it's by nomination (from classmates) and selection by the teacher. It's definitely not for the kids with the behavioral problems.
If you're feeling left out that your kid wasn't included, just find out who the faculty member in charge is and ask if there's room. And consider the possibility that your kid may not be a good fit, your kid may not be quite ready for it, or your kid may not have even wanted to do the activity.
I am happy any time DCPS is doing something to recognize higher skills in kids. Not everything needs to be open to everyone and slowed down to the pace of the least able child. I wish DCPS would do more of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leadership club is code for “maybe this will change their behavior.” Don’t feel left out.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Leadership club is code for “maybe this will change their behavior.” Don’t feel left out.