Anonymous wrote:Is there an echo in here?

Anonymous wrote:I won't talk about immigrants and human rights or ruined trade deals and the death of American farms or say "how is this America first."

All things considered, reviewing five years of a tourist's social media is not as horrific as other moves. But it suggests:

*utter disregard for the First Amendment
*our government going into mass surveillance mode
*a very predictable and costly negative effects on tourism (already happening!)

This fascism pure and simple. If a democrat had ever approximated any plans of this kind, you all would have lost your minds.

I want to understand how ANYONE who believes in civil liberties and core American principles can defend this.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-tourists-social-media-history-5-years-trump/

Anonymous wrote:I don’t agree with this policy but I don’t know what it has to do with the First Amendment. From what I understand it would be used to get prospective foreign visitors who are not yet in the US.

Anonymous wrote:I won't talk about immigrants and human rights or ruined trade deals and the death of American farms or say "how is this America first."

All things considered, reviewing five years of a tourist's social media is not as horrific as other moves. But it suggests:

*utter disregard for the First Amendment
*our government going into mass surveillance mode
*a very predictable and costly negative effects on tourism (already happening!)

This fascism pure and simple. If a democrat had ever approximated any plans of this kind, you all would have lost your minds.

I want to understand how ANYONE who believes in civil liberties and core American principles can defend this.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-tourists-social-media-history-5-years-trump/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t care. They like the idea of excluding people whose views they disagree with. They do not actually care about the First Amendment. They see it only as a tool for ensuring they themselves are not silenced. They are perfectly happy with a double standard as long as it benefits them.

It isn't just views they disagree with. It is pretext to bar anyone they want from entering the country. And they are totally fine with it. The goal is a white christian nationalist state.

Anonymous wrote:Things Republicans would scream and yell about if a Democrat did it, but shrug because it's Trump....

For $500, Alex

Anonymous wrote:They don’t care. They like the idea of excluding people whose views they disagree with. They do not actually care about the First Amendment. They see it only as a tool for ensuring they themselves are not silenced. They are perfectly happy with a double standard as long as it benefits them.

Anonymous wrote:They don’t care. They like the idea of excluding people whose views they disagree with. They do not actually care about the First Amendment. They see it only as a tool for ensuring they themselves are not silenced. They are perfectly happy with a double standard as long as it benefits them.