Anonymous wrote:One major (rhetorical) question is, why are the zionists okay with allowing not one, but three, Arab sovereign wealth funds to partake in this deal when outlets such as Al Jazeera are immediately panned or banned? Another is, why would any American government welcome foreign governments to have a control in American media outlets when there's always shouting about nefarious foreign influence from both sides of the aisle? Especially since any one of these probably trillion dollar entities could purchase it outright.

Being Arab doesn't preclude you from being Zionist. In fact, it's almost a prerequisite nowadays if you want to remain in power and not be overthrown or assassinated.

It’s never a good thing when foreigners own pieces of your media.

CNN has already been corrupted, but Ellison would do to it what Bari Weiss has done to CBS.

That would leave basically "MS-NOW" and part of the NY Times as the only remaining mainstream media outlets that are even remotely independent.

That will stick a fork in our republic.

If the Dems get back in power they must force these right wing media companies to break up.

Anonymous wrote:One major (rhetorical) question is, why are the zionists okay with allowing not one, but three, Arab sovereign wealth funds to partake in this deal when outlets such as Al Jazeera are immediately panned or banned? Another is, why would any American government welcome foreign governments to have a control in American media outlets when there's always shouting about nefarious foreign influence from both sides of the aisle? Especially since any one of these probably trillion dollar entities could purchase it outright.

Because the world lives in an oligarchy. They only say they hate each other to rile up the bases and keep them distracted from the corruption and cronyism.

One major (rhetorical) question is, why are the zionists okay with allowing not one, but three, Arab sovereign wealth funds to partake in this deal when outlets such as Al Jazeera are immediately panned or banned? Another is, why would any American government welcome foreign governments to have a control in American media outlets when there's always shouting about nefarious foreign influence from both sides of the aisle? Especially since any one of these probably trillion dollar entities could purchase it outright.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so the russians, chinese and saudi's want to take over one of the pillars of American communications.

Color me shocked.

But they have “non-voting shares” and no board seats, so they claim they have no say.

Of course a phone call to SIL in chief, and the fix is in.

Yeah right. They would own CNN and CBS.

Anonymous wrote:so the russians, chinese and saudi's want to take over one of the pillars of American communications.

Color me shocked.

Way to obfuscate the facts. It’s all Jared Kushner.

Anonymous wrote:so the russians, chinese and saudi's want to take over one of the pillars of American communications.

Color me shocked.

But they have “non-voting shares” and no board seats, so they claim they have no say.

Of course a phone call to SIL in chief, and the fix is in.

so the russians, chinese and saudi's want to take over one of the pillars of American communications.

Color me shocked.

Anonymous wrote:I'd rather have Netflix than the Ellisons.

I was soooo relieved when I saw Netflix won.

I'd rather have Netflix than the Ellisons.

They're at it again. This host of entities is not only problematic, it's nefarious. It seems this is the new strategy, to create entanglements with joint ventures in order to obfuscate loyalties.

This after Chump said that the Netflix, WBD deal is a problem.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/08/paramount-skydance-hostile-bid-wbd-netflix.html

Paramount Skydance launches hostile bid for WBD ‘to finish what we started,’ CEO Ellison tells CNBC

Paramount Skydance is launching a hostile bid to buy Warner Bros. Discovery after it lost out to Netflix in a monthslong bidding war for the legacy assets, the company said Monday.

The offer is backstopped with equity financing from the Ellison family and the private equity firm RedBird Capital as well as $54 billion in debt commitments from Bank of America, Citi and Apollo Global Management, Paramount said in a news release.

A portion of the equity financing comes from outside Middle Eastern financing partners including Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, Abu Dhabi’s L’imad Holding Company PJSC, and the Qatar Investment Authority. Another portion derives from Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners. Kushner is U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law.