All because of… what? There’s no evidence these vaccines hurt anyone. The entire ACIP meeting was just a bunch of lunatics screaming “WE DON’T KNOW” as justification for changing the recommendation.

“Maybe seatbelts cause leukemia. No one has studied it, so we don’t know!!!! We must stop requiring seatbelts!” That’s how ridiculous these people sound.

Anonymous wrote:There is no need for a Hep B vax for newborns unless the mother is positive. None at all.

+100

A lot of scandanavian countries only vaccinate infants with Hep B based on risk categories.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no reason why the hep b vax can't be pushed a few months like every other vaccine for the vast majority of people. The odds of contracting it are very low outside of the high risk population.

So ignorant of history and science. Go learn why we vax for hep b at birth.

So many stupid Americans these days who know zero history.

Post the links. Show the data for mothers who don't have hep b.

Children get hep b from the environment, daycare, people they come into contact with. We used to not vax at birth for hep B, but epidemiologists recognized that there was still persistent risk for hep B infection later in life when vaxxing later because kids would end up getting the virus from exposure from unexpected sources.

You're basically f'd if you get hep B and liver cancer. Is incurable and could have been entirely prevented.

Anonymous wrote:There is no need for a Hep B vax for newborns unless the mother is positive. None at all.

I agree on this one. And I don't like anything about RFK or this Adm.

Anonymous wrote:There's no reason why the hep b vax can't be pushed a few months like every other vaccine for the vast majority of people. The odds of contracting it are very low outside of the high risk population.

We literally already tried the risk based approach to vaccination and it failed you idiot.

The 2nd most common way children are infected is household contacts or even daycare as Hep B is highly virulent in tiny quantities, even though it is a blood borne pathogen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no need for a Hep B vax for newborns unless the mother is positive. None at all.

Another stupid American.

The abundance is shocking.

It is shocking.
And they are taking us all down with them.

1. We had a risk based approach to Hep B vaccination and it failed so we are returning to a failed approach

2. For anyone who says it is unnecessary to vaccinate babies because they don't have sex or do drugs, the 2nd most common way children are infected (after maternal transmission) is through household contacts or even potentially daycare contacts. That is because...

3.Even though Hep B is a blood borne pathogen, ila tiny amount of it is highly virulent and stable on dry surfaces for at least a week. As an example of this, dialysis facilities have additional protocols for Hepatitis B patients to prevent outbreaks that are not used for HIV patients or Hepatitis C patients. Anyone Hep B positive must he dialyzed in a separate room, with a separate dedicated machine and supplies, only used for Hepatitis B patients.

Children WILL die because of this roll back to a policy that was already known to fail.

Anonymous wrote:There is no need for a Hep B vax for newborns unless the mother is positive. None at all.

Another stupid American.

The abundance is shocking.

There is no need for a Hep B vax for newborns unless the mother is positive. None at all.

Anonymous wrote:There's no reason why the hep b vax can't be pushed a few months like every other vaccine for the vast majority of people. The odds of contracting it are very low outside of the high risk population.

So ignorant of history and science. Go learn why we vax for hep b at birth.

So many stupid Americans these days who know zero history.

Anonymous wrote:There's no reason why the hep b vax can't be pushed a few months like every other vaccine for the vast majority of people. The odds of contracting it are very low outside of the high risk population.

It’s okay if a few more babies die of preventable illness. But no abortions!

There's no reason why the hep b vax can't be pushed a few months like every other vaccine for the vast majority of people. The odds of contracting it are very low outside of the high risk population.

Why not research autism seriously instead of just going on feelings about vaccines? Or would that get too close to researching female health? Wouldn't want to do that!!!

Looks like no more Hep B vax for newborns. RFK MAHA by bringing back liver cancers for young adults. 😬

Hopefully the rest of the world quarantines Americans and refuses to let their potential disease carrying behinds in.

So amazing how Jenny McCarthy and a bunch of Mommy bloggers get to bring back polio, measles, and hep B again.

How does the AMA sit there and allow this insanity to continue when they supposedly took a Hippocratic Oath. Why are doctors so quiet while watching the 1890s come roaring back?