Anonymous
Post 12/10/2025 12:37     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


Hot take.

You know that every school has a bottom 50%, right? And that the bottom 50% of TJ kids are still very smart and likely outpacing the bottom 50% at their base schools. Those kids have had to grind and maybe instead of seeing that as "sad," we see it as an opportunity to learn grit and resilience. I also disagree that they aren't ready for college--there is zero grade inflation at TJ and these kids have to work hard. They won't get into T20/Ivys (unless hooked) but my guess is most will be fine long-term.

Also, they can drop or be removed. The new principal sent a slew of sophomores back to base school at the end of last year bc they didn't pass Algebra 2.


Nope. 1) The bottom 20% are not learning grit and resilience. Which each year, they are falling behind more and more. By the time they are seniors, they are 2-3 years behind the level where they could /should have been. By that time, it is almost impossible for these kids to progress in class without a lot of extra support. And that kind of support is non-existent. If they had it, they would not end up in position they are in. 2) There are a lot, and I mean, a lot of kids with Ds and C-s in math and science on TJ, barely passing and moving in. Once again, by the time they get to college they are actually far behind their friends from base school - they used to be at about the same level in 8th grade but they fell behind while struggling this much at TJ.


You're just completely wrong on every level. And items presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Anonymous
Post 12/07/2025 10:51     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


TJ has effectively 100% AP participation rate and greater than 98% AP exam pass rates. Very frequently some subgroups have 100% AP exam annual pass rates. Look at the public data. The "bottom" at TJ where kids fail and struggle to pass AP is around 2% at most. Overall TJ kids are passing at rates that are leagues above all other schools.
Anonymous
Post 12/07/2025 08:31     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


Hot take.

You know that every school has a bottom 50%, right? And that the bottom 50% of TJ kids are still very smart and likely outpacing the bottom 50% at their base schools. Those kids have had to grind and maybe instead of seeing that as "sad," we see it as an opportunity to learn grit and resilience. I also disagree that they aren't ready for college--there is zero grade inflation at TJ and these kids have to work hard. They won't get into T20/Ivys (unless hooked) but my guess is most will be fine long-term.

Also, they can drop or be removed. The new principal sent a slew of sophomores back to base school at the end of last year bc they didn't pass Algebra 2.


Nope. 1) The bottom 20% are not learning grit and resilience. Which each year, they are falling behind more and more. By the time they are seniors, they are 2-3 years behind the level where they could /should have been. By that time, it is almost impossible for these kids to progress in class without a lot of extra support. And that kind of support is non-existent. If they had it, they would not end up in position they are in. 2) There are a lot, and I mean, a lot of kids with Ds and C-s in math and science on TJ, barely passing and moving in. Once again, by the time they get to college they are actually far behind their friends from base school - they used to be at about the same level in 8th grade but they fell behind while struggling this much at TJ.


Does TJ provide any support to the kids who struggle?


Yes. They have 8th period which has clubs but can also be used for going to meet with teachers to get help on certain things. The whole school has it at the same time so teachers wouldn’t have a class during that period. Think there are also some student run clubs that offer tutoring help.
Anonymous
Post 12/06/2025 18:16     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


Hot take.

You know that every school has a bottom 50%, right? And that the bottom 50% of TJ kids are still very smart and likely outpacing the bottom 50% at their base schools. Those kids have had to grind and maybe instead of seeing that as "sad," we see it as an opportunity to learn grit and resilience. I also disagree that they aren't ready for college--there is zero grade inflation at TJ and these kids have to work hard. They won't get into T20/Ivys (unless hooked) but my guess is most will be fine long-term.

Also, they can drop or be removed. The new principal sent a slew of sophomores back to base school at the end of last year bc they didn't pass Algebra 2.


Nope. 1) The bottom 20% are not learning grit and resilience. Which each year, they are falling behind more and more. By the time they are seniors, they are 2-3 years behind the level where they could /should have been. By that time, it is almost impossible for these kids to progress in class without a lot of extra support. And that kind of support is non-existent. If they had it, they would not end up in position they are in. 2) There are a lot, and I mean, a lot of kids with Ds and C-s in math and science on TJ, barely passing and moving in. Once again, by the time they get to college they are actually far behind their friends from base school - they used to be at about the same level in 8th grade but they fell behind while struggling this much at TJ.


Does TJ provide any support to the kids who struggle?
Anonymous
Post 12/05/2025 12:39     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


This may be true at the very bottom (like the 10th or 20th percentile) but the 40th percentile?


The kids I've met who are like in the 25th-50th percentile at TJ are all very well prepared for college.
Anonymous
Post 12/05/2025 12:34     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


Hot take.

You know that every school has a bottom 50%, right? And that the bottom 50% of TJ kids are still very smart and likely outpacing the bottom 50% at their base schools. Those kids have had to grind and maybe instead of seeing that as "sad," we see it as an opportunity to learn grit and resilience. I also disagree that they aren't ready for college--there is zero grade inflation at TJ and these kids have to work hard. They won't get into T20/Ivys (unless hooked) but my guess is most will be fine long-term.

Also, they can drop or be removed. The new principal sent a slew of sophomores back to base school at the end of last year bc they didn't pass Algebra 2.


Nope. 1) The bottom 20% are not learning grit and resilience. Which each year, they are falling behind more and more. By the time they are seniors, they are 2-3 years behind the level where they could /should have been. By that time, it is almost impossible for these kids to progress in class without a lot of extra support. And that kind of support is non-existent. If they had it, they would not end up in position they are in. 2) There are a lot, and I mean, a lot of kids with Ds and C-s in math and science on TJ, barely passing and moving in. Once again, by the time they get to college they are actually far behind their friends from base school - they used to be at about the same level in 8th grade but they fell behind while struggling this much at TJ.
Anonymous
Post 12/05/2025 12:04     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


Hot take.

You know that every school has a bottom 50%, right? And that the bottom 50% of TJ kids are still very smart and likely outpacing the bottom 50% at their base schools. Those kids have had to grind and maybe instead of seeing that as "sad," we see it as an opportunity to learn grit and resilience. I also disagree that they aren't ready for college--there is zero grade inflation at TJ and these kids have to work hard. They won't get into T20/Ivys (unless hooked) but my guess is most will be fine long-term.

Also, they can drop or be removed. The new principal sent a slew of sophomores back to base school at the end of last year bc they didn't pass Algebra 2.
Anonymous
Post 12/05/2025 11:22     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.


This may be true at the very bottom (like the 10th or 20th percentile) but the 40th percentile?
Anonymous
Post 12/05/2025 06:38     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

The very bottom kids at TJ are NOT as prepared for college as top kids at base school. These very bottom kids sit in lowest math and science classes and still struggling, masking their struggles year after year because they have no option to drop, wasting their time and accumulating years of not really progressing because they are in over their heads. It is sad, really.
Anonymous
Post 12/04/2025 16:19     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:There are many many variables in college admissions. Time to write and space to write limit the discussion included in this post.

At either magnet school, college admissions is strongly impacted by the student's (approximate) class rank. Even if no official class rank is calculated, colleges will impute an approximate class rank from the school profile.

For college admissions, it is better to be in the top 20%-25% of the graduating class at any magnet (or top 10%-20% of a non-magnet) than it is to be in the bottom 50%.

This is one reason some students will have better college admissions odds from their geographic zoned HS.


If the OP is asking about top colleges then I don't think they are concerned that their kid falls into the group of kids that are A students at base schools and B/C students at TJ.

Yes, the kids in the bottom half of TJ would have better college entrance results at their base school but they are likely more prepared for their college experience coming out of TJ.
The kids at the very top of TJ, the pathway to top schools is wider. No guarantees but wider.
Anonymous
Post 12/04/2025 14:39     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

Anonymous wrote:I think the answer has to depend to some extent on where you live in Loudoun. I've heard of people who live in western Loudoun -- i.e. Round Hill, Purcellville, etc. -- and the kids commute to TJ. There is no way in my mind that the commute could be worth the compromised quality-of-life when the Academies are an option (and even the commute to the Academies every other day from western Loudoun would be pretty long).


+1
I don't see how those kids do it.
That said, if you're not on the super far end of Loudoun, the full time nature of TJ (vs the part time nature of the Academy) is something to keep in mind too. What DD's loved most about TJ has been the vibe and friends she's made there - she's convinced she wouldn't have connected the same way at our base school (where she went to MS) - and you wouldn't have the same EC type experience at the Academy that TJ offers due to being a full time model.
Anonymous
Post 12/03/2025 20:40     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

I think the answer has to depend to some extent on where you live in Loudoun. I've heard of people who live in western Loudoun -- i.e. Round Hill, Purcellville, etc. -- and the kids commute to TJ. There is no way in my mind that the commute could be worth the compromised quality-of-life when the Academies are an option (and even the commute to the Academies every other day from western Loudoun would be pretty long).
Anonymous
Post 12/03/2025 20:31     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

TJ is obviously better. How is this even a question?
Anonymous
Post 12/03/2025 09:03     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

There are many many variables in college admissions. Time to write and space to write limit the discussion included in this post.

At either magnet school, college admissions is strongly impacted by the student's (approximate) class rank. Even if no official class rank is calculated, colleges will impute an approximate class rank from the school profile.

For college admissions, it is better to be in the top 20%-25% of the graduating class at any magnet (or top 10%-20% of a non-magnet) than it is to be in the bottom 50%.

This is one reason some students will have better college admissions odds from their geographic zoned HS.
Anonymous
Post 12/03/2025 00:29     Subject: Comparing TJ to Academies of Loudoun

How are these 2

in
academics
ECs
culture

- is one better than the other for top colleges?