Bama's got the MAGA Woke rot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we surprised? Alabama voted for this. Is there any surprise that there is racism or sexism in Alabama? I mean, just look at any post about Alabama on this forum.

+1. I am surprised people are surprised by this.

I think it's because they are moving to a space that hasn't existed before. Since the time women were first admitted to the school in 1893 (!), there have probably been women's magazines or publications. Even if they were "Women's Lit" or "Good Housekeeping"-esque. To me it feels like uncharted waters to cancel a publication because its target audience has a gender or cultural identity.

Anonymous wrote:Are we surprised? Alabama voted for this. Is there any surprise that there is racism or sexism in Alabama? I mean, just look at any post about Alabama on this forum.

+1. I am surprised people are surprised by this.

Transfer out or don’t apply. It’s a mess.

I agree that there is way too much complying in advance.

I was looking at schools in another state yesterday that is known for happily complying with this admin. I was glad to see some private schools there that were upfront about their DEI initiatives. I know, not state schools, but even private schools are bending over.

It's shocking and shameful how much compliance in advance is going on in the country. If this Administration made these student activities an issue (and while I put nothing past this Administration I doubt this would have been a target), Alabama should have had their backs and fought back.

Where is Katie Britt now!

If you’re not a white male, you’re a second class student at Alabama. Proceed informed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So a women's magazine can't be funded by the school anymore? I have a feeling "Sororities Sisters of Alabama" wouldn't lose their funding... male gaze and all. As long as it teaches them how to tradwife and please their man.

Great point. And same for linebackers of Alabama, all of whom happen to be black.

You don't think husbands, wives, and partners should be pleasing to one another?

Pleasing the football team or pleasing future husbands? Sorry getting confused over here.

At least we all agree that there's no justification for a women's magazine to be funded on a university campus. I'm sure the football team will make good use of the $2k increase to their budget from the magazines' defunding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So a women's magazine can't be funded by the school anymore? I have a feeling "Sororities Sisters of Alabama" wouldn't lose their funding... male gaze and all. As long as it teaches them how to tradwife and please their man.

Great point. And same for linebackers of Alabama, all of whom happen to be black.

You don't think husbands, wives, and partners should be pleasing to one another?

Anonymous wrote:So a women's magazine can't be funded by the school anymore? I have a feeling "Sororities Sisters of Alabama" wouldn't lose their funding... male gaze and all. As long as it teaches them how to tradwife and please their man.

Great point. And same for linebackers of Alabama, all of whom happen to be black.

So a women's magazine can't be funded by the school anymore? I have a feeling "Sororities Sisters of Alabama" wouldn't lose their funding... male gaze and all. As long as it teaches them how to tradwife and please their man.

Are we surprised? Alabama voted for this. Is there any surprise that there is racism or sexism in Alabama? I mean, just look at any post about Alabama on this forum.

"One attendee noted in the meeting that their magazines had remained open to students of all backgrounds, not just to their target audiences. But Dr. Hood said that wasn’t enough to avoid federal scrutiny.

Alex House, a spokeswoman with the university, said in a statement on Tuesday that the suspensions — first reported by the student newspaper, The Crimson White — were in compliance with the law.

“This requires us to ensure all members of our community feel welcome to participate in programs that receive university funding from the Office of Student Media,” Ms. House said. She added that the university “will never restrict our students’ freedom of expression.”

Kendal Wright, the editor in chief of Nineteen Fifty-Six, said in a statement that she was “devastated but, regrettably, not surprised” by the university’s decision, “based on the current climate of our country.”

To Gabrielle Gunter, the editor in chief of Alice, it appeared that the university had determined that merely the magazines’ target audiences were enough to warrant their suspensions under the attorney general’s memo. In the meeting, Dr. Hood said that because Alice appeared to be a magazine predominantly “for women, by women,” it didn’t abide by the federal guidance.

“I thought that because of the First Amendment, the freedom of press, that Alice wouldn’t be affected by any identity-based legislation, or rulings, or memos,” Ms. Gunter said in an interview on Tuesday. “Supposedly, it’s not applicable here.”

Alice magazine was already in the process of putting together its next issue when the news came, Ms. Gunter said, adding that her staff was shocked and angry. “It’s extremely sad, especially for those of us who have worked on these magazines for so long,” she said.

Like hundreds of other higher education institutions, the University of Alabama has been paring back its D.E.I. programs in recent years. Following the Alabama Legislature’s passage of a law banning such programs at publicly funded institutions last year, the university shuttered its Division of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and closed spaces on campus dedicated to Black and L.G.B.T.Q. students.

The students working at the magazines were informed that the publications’ websites and previously published content would be preserved, and that those in paid positions would continue to receive paychecks through the spring semester. In the new year, Mr. Hood said, the university would work to start a new campus lifestyle magazine that caters to all student identities.

After announcing the suspensions on Monday, Dr. Hood invited the editors of the magazines to help build that new publication.

Ms. Gunter wasn’t sure if her staff would take him up on it."

Anonymous wrote:Pretty concerning. Affirmative action is one thing, but not being allowed to have a magazine about your culture/topic of interest?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/02/us/u-of-alabama-student-magazines-dei.html

"The University of Alabama on Monday suspended two student magazines — one appealing to women, another to Black students — saying they ran afoul of guidance from the Justice Department on diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

University officials told staff members at the publications — a women’s lifestyle magazine called Alice and Nineteen Fifty-Six, which encompasses Black culture and student life — that because of shifting federal policy on D.E.I. programs, the university could no longer support them. One official attributed the decision in part to a July memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi, in which she included recommendations on how institutions receiving federal funding could avoid what the Trump administration deemed unlawful D.E.I. practices.

In a meeting on Monday announcing the suspensions, Steven Hood, the university’s vice president of student life, told students that their magazines had violated those standards. He specifically cited portions of the memo warning against the use of “unlawful proxies” — described as the use of “ostensibly neutral criteria that function as substitutes for explicit consideration of race, sex or other protected characteristics.”

In light of the federal guidance, “you can understand why as a public institution we might not be able to support magazines that are based on demographics like these two magazines are,” Dr. Hood said, according to a recording of the meeting that was shared with The Times."

This is childish performative crap. I think DEI went overboard. But Trump and his ignorant followers are going overboard and just being babies to stick it to the libs. Meanwhile he is letting bad criminals out of jail, denying people their civil rights, having loser ICE dorks in their dumb masks harass innocent people (while once in a blue moon actually getting someone who did something wrong). But the ignorant masses think fatso is great. God Bless America.

Pretty concerning. Affirmative action is one thing, but not being allowed to have a magazine about your culture/topic of interest?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/02/us/u-of-alabama-student-magazines-dei.html

"The University of Alabama on Monday suspended two student magazines — one appealing to women, another to Black students — saying they ran afoul of guidance from the Justice Department on diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

University officials told staff members at the publications — a women’s lifestyle magazine called Alice and Nineteen Fifty-Six, which encompasses Black culture and student life — that because of shifting federal policy on D.E.I. programs, the university could no longer support them. One official attributed the decision in part to a July memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi, in which she included recommendations on how institutions receiving federal funding could avoid what the Trump administration deemed unlawful D.E.I. practices.

In a meeting on Monday announcing the suspensions, Steven Hood, the university’s vice president of student life, told students that their magazines had violated those standards. He specifically cited portions of the memo warning against the use of “unlawful proxies” — described as the use of “ostensibly neutral criteria that function as substitutes for explicit consideration of race, sex or other protected characteristics.”

In light of the federal guidance, “you can understand why as a public institution we might not be able to support magazines that are based on demographics like these two magazines are,” Dr. Hood said, according to a recording of the meeting that was shared with The Times."