Anonymous wrote:It benefits the school in terms of locking in students who can pay. But it doesn’t benefit the school in terms of the diversity of the applicant pool. More kids from a wider range of backgrounds will apply regular decision.
Anonymous wrote:Not all kids are ready to decide by Dec. My kid’s preferences changed a lot from start if Senior year to April, they applied far and wide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they w
Oops- hit send too soon.
I wish they would this year.
Though my firstborn was deferred and then randomly fired off 10 applications. He turned down the deferred school when he got in RD and ended up at a school that wasn’t even in his radar or top of the list - an RD Ivy. Looking back it was the better fit and kid is thriving.
I think there are a lot of kids like this. Our HS counselor always says they will end up where they are meant to be. In hindsight, kid’s first choice would not have “fit” him.
I do believe things happen for a reason. I was WL at my own top choices and went to my safety…it was perfect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree 100% is probably too much but I wonder how high schools can go before they start getting diminishing returns. 50%? 95%?
Chicago is already taking 80% of the class between ED0 to ED3.
Anonymous wrote:I agree 100% is probably too much but I wonder how high schools can go before they start getting diminishing returns. 50%? 95%?
Anonymous wrote:I wish they w
.