Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have either achieved or inherited generational wealth, middle class notions of “jobs” and “employment” aren’t relevant.
They are. Those people just don't have jobs. We typically refer to those people as bums.
Anonymous wrote:If you have either achieved or inherited generational wealth, middle class notions of “jobs” and “employment” aren’t relevant.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's that black and white ... many moms at our private don't work full time in an office but they have part time side gigs like they design jewelry, dabble in photography or teach yoga. I certainly don't think their families depend on their income but it gives them a sense of purpose other than just staying home and raising kids.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a working mom. My kids are now at public school but for awhile we’re at a Catholic parochial school. At the Catholic school the expectation almost seemed to be that the mom was either a stay at home mom or worked very very part time. I think my kids only had one classmate with a full time working mom.
Now that my kids are at public school I don’t think there are any stay at home moms in my daughter‘a class and only one that I know of in my son’s class.
Anonymous wrote:I have a friend whose kids go to private with financial aid and she commented that before sending her kids to private school, she didn't know any families with SAHMs (or dads for that matter) by choice. If you don't have inherited wealth or a spouse earning 500k+ it's hard to see how a family would give up a second income.
But there are a good number of SAHMs in the private school families. She said most moms still work, but maybe 20-30% either don't work or have more of a part time hobby/creative side gig that isn't really contributing much to family income.