Anonymous wrote:This has been happening in India for a long time. Different entry fees for locals and foreigners (including Indian Americans).

The same happens in Singapore as well.

This has been happening in India for a long time. Different entry fees for locals and foreigners (including Indian Americans).

The US has a tourism problem. It was the only country in the world in 2025 to see a decline in tourism. Canadians are the largest source of foreign tourists. We are not paying US $250 to enter a national park.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

Suggestion: research fees for museum entrance in Europe. Come back and list the free ones.

What's your point? This poster is not wrong. In France and Italy for instance many museums are free for young Euro citizens.

The point is that in many European countries you find one price for citizens and residents and another higher price for foreigners.

Right, which is what that other poster stated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

Suggestion: research fees for museum entrance in Europe. Come back and list the free ones.

What's your point? This poster is not wrong. In France and Italy for instance many museums are free for young Euro citizens.

The point is that in many European countries you find one price for citizens and residents and another higher price for foreigners.

Anonymous wrote:It’s ridiculous. $250?? I wouldn’t pay that.

This is for a ticket to ALL parks, not just one park and it's per car, not per person.

It’s ridiculous. $250?? I wouldn’t pay that.

Well, they have to find some way to reduce attendance because they don’t have the staff to maintain them.

We’re look at the parks very strongly.
The trees. The trees I tell you.
Everyone loves the trees.
It’s an old-fashioned word.
But it’s a word.

I don't mind it. It's only for the busiest parks which see a lot of large buses come in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

Suggestion: research fees for museum entrance in Europe. Come back and list the free ones.

What's your point? This poster is not wrong. In France and Italy for instance many museums are free for young Euro citizens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

Suggestion: research fees for museum entrance in Europe. Come back and list the free ones.

Not sure of your point here. I know there are very few museums or other attractions (including churches!) in Europe which are free, and many charge foreign visitors extra.

That's why I don't object to charging foreign tourists more here. They do it, why not us?

Anonymous wrote:
It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

Suggestion: research fees for museum entrance in Europe. Come back and list the free ones.

It says American residents (not just citizens) so I think all that will be required is a driver's license or other ID.

TBH, this is not that unusual. Many countries have already adopted a two-tier system or surcharges for international tourists.

Frankly, after seeing busloads of foreign tourists overcrowding our National Parks, I don't really have an objection to it.

The plan is to charge international tourists higher fees to enter some popular parks. I’m curious about how this will work in practice. Would it mean that American citizens will have to prove their citizenship status prior to paying entry fees? And, if it does, in a country where most don’t have passports, what documents will be acceptable?

I’m not sure what I think of this two-tiered pricing — which also seems to include fee-free holidays when the parks will be restricted to citizens. I also wonder where the administration is going with this. Is the plan to extend this to more parks and possibly other types of tax payer supported sites? While I get the benefits of free admissions for taxpayers, I’m concerned about policies that could require proof of citizenship and identity for access — especially given how such policies could be extended and potentially abused.


https://www.npr.org/2025/11/26/g-s1-99442/national-parks-fees-international-tourists