Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Get bent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties.
Good point. I've had a couple of veteran friends (ones who have not struggled) say that.
Anonymous wrote:"publicly funded, privately run* is the model for graft.
Socialize the costs, privatize the benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties. Of course, those anxieties are replaced by other ones - seeing active combat, year-long deployments, etc.
But when socialism works well (see: U.S. military life), people often flounder when they are removed from that structure and tossed into the cold reality of the U.S. civilian economy and society.
Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Y'all cain't take away mah (subsidized but not socialist) freedom.
fixed that for ya'. Minor oversight. It's early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Y'all cain't take away mah (subsidized but not socialist) freedom.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?