Anonymous
Post 11/20/2025 15:26     Subject: MCPS admits first round of boundary options weren't real

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is so disingenuous. The first set was designed to provoke outrage from a certain set of


Certain set of what?


PP means they used the first round of options to get specific neighborhoods outraged so they could say that people only care about proximity and not demographics. Basically to justify increasing racial and economic segregation.
Anonymous
Post 11/20/2025 15:02     Subject: MCPS admits first round of boundary options weren't real

Anonymous wrote:This is so disingenuous. The first set was designed to provoke outrage from a certain set of


Certain set of what?
Anonymous
Post 11/19/2025 21:40     Subject: MCPS admits first round of boundary options weren't real

Anonymous wrote:This is so disingenuous. The first set was designed to provoke outrage from a certain set of


+1000
Exactly. What a disgusting process.
Anonymous
Post 11/19/2025 21:24     Subject: MCPS admits first round of boundary options weren't real

This is so disingenuous. The first set was designed to provoke outrage from a certain set of
Anonymous
Post 11/19/2025 21:20     Subject: MCPS admits first round of boundary options weren't real

https://www.fox5dc.com/news/concern-over-newly-proposed-school-boundary-program-montgomery-county?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=691e173915378a0001af9f4e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook

From the MCPS statement in the article:

"The initial boundary options were never intended as final recommendations; they were draft models designed to test variables. Community's feedback has directly shaped the second wave of scenarios, which explores a broader set of approaches and reflects what we have heard from the community."
.