Anonymous wrote:A smaller pond generally means opportunities. Are you sure you would be a big fish vs just another fish?
This is really not true. Smaller ponds have opportunities to scale because there is not a population need for more. Unless you're working for a national organization HQed in a smaller location (in which case, more you're locked in by the smaller number of competing employers), opportunities are generally to scale. I would consider it a huge risk to move to an area that is dominated by a small number of employers as many of them will treat you only as well as your alternative require.
The smallest ponds have zero opportunity. This is why rural America is dying - no jobs, no opportunity, no tax base to provide amenities that would draw employers/employees to the area.