Anonymous wrote:After you, OP.
How many dollars have you sent to hungry children?
How many refugees are living in your home?
How many cancer stricken children’s gofundmes have you contributed to?
How many wells have you built in Africa?
How many single moms have you personally assisted?
PS republicans give more $$ to charity than democrats https://finance.yahoo.com/news/more-generous-liberals-conservatives-081500677.html
Anonymous wrote:Would you actually walk past a starving child and just shrug your shoulders and say well guess you should have worked harder and pulled yourself up from poverty. Sorry not sorry.
From my view point republicans as a whole at this point would actually not hesitate to shoot a person if they got in the way of their “America (white person) first agenda”. Please tell me I am wrong.
Anonymous wrote:I respect that you support SNAP benefits, and I agree that helping families who are struggling to afford food is important. But supporting the idea behind SNAP doesn’t mean we should ignore the serious problems in how related funding is being managed.
There is corruption and inefficiency behind some of these federal nutrition programs, and pretending everything is working perfectly does a disservice to the very people SNAP is supposed to help. If the system were functioning the way politicians claim, we wouldn’t still see food banks overwhelmed, families waiting in long lines, and working people relying on donated meals just to get through the week.
Supporting SNAP shouldn’t mean automatically defending every layer of bureaucracy surrounding it. It should mean making sure the money actually reaches families — not getting lost in administrative waste, questionable contracts, or programs that sound good on paper but fail in practice. When people talk about these issues, they’re not attacking SNAP itself; they’re calling out a system that needs transparency, accountability, and reform.
If we truly care about fighting hunger, we should be willing to look honestly at where the funding goes, where it’s failing, and who benefits from the inefficiencies. Real support for struggling families means fixing what’s broken — not pretending everything works just because a particular political party says it does.
Anonymous wrote:I respect that you support SNAP benefits, and I agree that helping families who are struggling to afford food is important. But supporting the idea behind SNAP doesn’t mean we should ignore the serious problems in how related funding is being managed.
There is corruption and inefficiency behind some of these federal nutrition programs, and pretending everything is working perfectly does a disservice to the very people SNAP is supposed to help. If the system were functioning the way politicians claim, we wouldn’t still see food banks overwhelmed, families waiting in long lines, and working people relying on donated meals just to get through the week.
Supporting SNAP shouldn’t mean automatically defending every layer of bureaucracy surrounding it. It should mean making sure the money actually reaches families — not getting lost in administrative waste, questionable contracts, or programs that sound good on paper but fail in practice. When people talk about these issues, they’re not attacking SNAP itself; they’re calling out a system that needs transparency, accountability, and reform.
If we truly care about fighting hunger, we should be willing to look honestly at where the funding goes, where it’s failing, and who benefits from the inefficiencies. Real support for struggling families means fixing what’s broken — not pretending everything works just because a particular political party says it does.
Anonymous wrote:I worked hard as a software developer
I was replaced by an h1b. I saw many coworkers also replaced by h1bs
When will democrat start helping people like me?
When will democrats fight for US workers. ?
Anonymous wrote:After you, OP.
How many dollars have you sent to hungry children?
How many refugees are living in your home?
How many cancer stricken children’s gofundmes have you contributed to?
How many wells have you built in Africa?
How many single moms have you personally assisted?
PS republicans give more $$ to charity than democrats https://finance.yahoo.com/news/more-generous-liberals-conservatives-081500677.html
Anonymous wrote:After you, OP.
How many dollars have you sent to hungry children?
How many refugees are living in your home?
How many cancer stricken children’s gofundmes have you contributed to?
How many wells have you built in Africa?
How many single moms have you personally assisted?
PS republicans give more $$ to charity than democrats https://finance.yahoo.com/news/more-generous-liberals-conservatives-081500677.html
Anonymous wrote:I worked hard as a software developer
I was replaced by an h1b. I saw many coworkers also replaced by h1bs
When will democrat start helping people like me?
When will democrats fight for US workers. ?
Anonymous wrote:I worked hard as a software developer
I was replaced by an h1b. I saw many coworkers also replaced by h1bs
When will democrat start helping people like me?
When will democrats fight for US workers. ?
Anonymous wrote:I respect that you support SNAP benefits, and I agree that helping families who are struggling to afford food is important. But supporting the idea behind SNAP doesn’t mean we should ignore the serious problems in how related funding is being managed.
There is corruption and inefficiency behind some of these federal nutrition programs, and pretending everything is working perfectly does a disservice to the very people SNAP is supposed to help. If the system were functioning the way politicians claim, we wouldn’t still see food banks overwhelmed, families waiting in long lines, and working people relying on donated meals just to get through the week.
Supporting SNAP shouldn’t mean automatically defending every layer of bureaucracy surrounding it. It should mean making sure the money actually reaches families — not getting lost in administrative waste, questionable contracts, or programs that sound good on paper but fail in practice. When people talk about these issues, they’re not attacking SNAP itself; they’re calling out a system that needs transparency, accountability, and reform.
If we truly care about fighting hunger, we should be willing to look honestly at where the funding goes, where it’s failing, and who benefits from the inefficiencies. Real support for struggling families means fixing what’s broken — not pretending everything works just because a particular political party says it does.