Anonymous wrote:In slightly related news, the County put out their annual Vision Zero report. Tucked towards the back of it are actually stats. Pedestrian fatalities up compared to the prior year, and same with fatal crashes. I guess all those vision zero efforts aren't yielding the intended results, though they are making things more annoying and time-wasting for drivers. Win?
Anonymous wrote:Because people are used to the cameras being there, and everyone slows down in those spots. Less tickets are generated, and the camera operator takes in less revenue. So they moved them to someplace else.
This is all about $$$, not safety. And this is your proof of that.
For the record, they will also move cameras from places where the camera keeps getting vandalized or destroyed. That’s how the one in our neighborhood got relocated. It was costing more to repair or replace it than it was generating tickets. Again - further proof it’s not about safety, just money.
Anonymous wrote:In the past 24 hours I have noticed that speed cameras iinside the beltway on CT, Wisconsin, and Bradley between Wisconsin and CT are gone.
If they are replacing with those poles (like on CT in Kensington), why wouldn’t they install the new before removing the old? Or is there a newer, less obvious technology already installed that maybe we can’t see?
Anonymous wrote:Weren't they ruled illegal recently nationwide?
Anonymous wrote:
For the record, they will also move cameras from places where the camera keeps getting vandalized or destroyed. That’s how the one in our neighborhood got relocated. It was costing more to repair or replace it than it was generating tickets. Again - further proof it’s not about safety, just money.
Anonymous wrote:
that has to be among the stupidest and least-informative articles I've ever encountered.