Ok she was expelled but hopefully he is a federal criminal and on the sexual predator registry

This is also why you don’t sign the photo waiver and keep kids off social media.

My kid would be spending their expulsion at Disneyland, and the lawyers who will be suing the school for their role would surely be able to ensure there were no academic consequences.

Anonymous wrote:Violence is never the right answer.

Agree in almost all matters as violence typically leads to more violence.

Anonymous wrote:The boys in question were charges with ten criminal offenses.

The school district's statement says that there is misinformation.

OP, why did you choose the verb "smack" in your subject?

She hit the kid in August. The charges were brought in September.

Anonymous wrote:Violence is never the right answer.

Disagree. In school, it's very much the right answer. Kids don't know where to draw the line especially since teachers coddle the worst kids and defend them the most, thus preventing them from learning empathy. I'm not condoning bullying at all or saying that the following should be a normal occurrence. But getting beat up by a kid in the same grade (or the very threat it could happen) for being an a-hole to them can prevent most of these kids from continuing down that path the rest of their lives. Kids like this girl shouldn't be "remedied" for defending themselves. And judging by the large number of unempathetic, no affect politicians these days, I think it's safe to say that many were the a-holes who were protected by the teachers.

The boys in question were charges with ten criminal offenses.

The school district's statement says that there is misinformation.

OP, why did you choose the verb "smack" in your subject?

Anonymous wrote:Sounds about right. (Not agreeing at all, just noticing that girls and women are punished more harshly for standing up for themselves than the people who harm them in the first place.)

The boys were criminally charged, on ten counts. Expulsion is not a harsher punishment.

Her dad isn't angry at the other child that did it. The police were involved and he feels that part is being dealt with, and he knows that developmentally the boy didn't really understand the ramifications of what he did.

He is furious with the school who didn't let her call him when it happened despite her requests and who ignored her efforts to get help, get the pictures deleted, get the exploitation and bullying to stop that day etc. Had they taken action, she wouldn't have ended up beside him on the school bus to go home from school. The boy should have been called in immediately when it happened and the pictures deleted then. They were still on his phone on the bus on the way home.

Anonymous wrote:Violence is never the right answer.

What would constitute self defense to what this boy was doing to her on the bus? The allegatino is that she tried to get the school to intervene and instead of helping her, they put her on the school bus with him where the bullying continued.

Sounds about right. (Not agreeing at all, just noticing that girls and women are punished more harshly for standing up for themselves than the people who harm them in the first place.)

Violence is never the right answer.

We need to change our laws. Generating fake pornographic content needs to be considered a felony for sexual assault.

Disgusting. That poor girl.

Louisiana girl expelled for smacking boy who distributed AI child pornography imagery of her

https://www.wsaw.com/2025/11/12/girl-13-expelled-hitting-classmate-who-made-deepfake-porn-image-her-lawyers-say/

Don't rely on the school admin to protect victims.