Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Md. (7News) — A new report from the Maryland State Board of Education has declared Montgomery County Public Schools’ (MCPS) $168 million electric school bus contract “illegal,” saying the district violated its own procurement rules when awarding the deal.
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/maryland-report-says-mcps-electric-bus-deal-is-illegal-montgomery-county-public-schools-parents-coalition-iteam
Will charges be brought against any current MCPS staff? That would be helpful.
Anonymous wrote:MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Md. (7News) — A new report from the Maryland State Board of Education has declared Montgomery County Public Schools’ (MCPS) $168 million electric school bus contract “illegal,” saying the district violated its own procurement rules when awarding the deal.
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/maryland-report-says-mcps-electric-bus-deal-is-illegal-montgomery-county-public-schools-parents-coalition-iteam
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
The BOE's rubber stamp of all MCPS proposals would not change if they were full time (though I agree they should be).
Have you tried to do anything with your special powers to predict the future and opine that things will never change?
Essie McGuire is full-time. She was full-time when this contract came before the BOE. She is well paid.
She said she was very confident in this lease. She said it was an innovation. She said it can be checked by legal, budget and MCPS Dept of Transportation. She said she was very excited to bring this to the BOE.
Paying her a good salary to work full-time got MCPS in financial trouble.
You're confusing MCPS Central Office implementation with BOE oversight. Yes, MCPS Central Office staff are full-time and shouldn't have screwed up this contract. But expecting BOE oversight with part-time people paid $25k a year to do a full-time job is basically saying you don't value oversight of MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
The BOE's rubber stamp of all MCPS proposals would not change if they were full time (though I agree they should be).
Have you tried to do anything with your special powers to predict the future and opine that things will never change?
Essie McGuire is full-time. She was full-time when this contract came before the BOE. She is well paid.
She said she was very confident in this lease. She said it was an innovation. She said it can be checked by legal, budget and MCPS Dept of Transportation. She said she was very excited to bring this to the BOE.
Paying her a good salary to work full-time got MCPS in financial trouble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
The BOE's rubber stamp of all MCPS proposals would not change if they were full time (though I agree they should be).
Have you tried to do anything with your special powers to predict the future and opine that things will never change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/maryland-report-says-mcps-electric-bus-deal-is-illegal-montgomery-county-public-schools-parents-coalition-iteam
Additional questions about the deal surfaced last year, when a public report cast doubt on the district’s claim that transitioning from diesel to electric buses would result in “zero net change” in transportation costs. Soon after, the Montgomery County Inspector General raised further concerns, citing delivery delays and the district’s failure to recover $372,000 from Highland for buses that were not operational.
The state board’s 11-page report also referenced the criminal convictions of two former MCPS transportation officials, including an assistant director who stole more than $300,000 from the project. Their involvement, the board concluded, further “tainted” the procurement process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
The BOE's rubber stamp of all MCPS proposals would not change if they were full time (though I agree they should be).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Part of the problem is that Board of Education member are treated like part-time volunteers rather than have meaningful oversight...
Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?
Additional questions about the deal surfaced last year, when a public report cast doubt on the district’s claim that transitioning from diesel to electric buses would result in “zero net change” in transportation costs. Soon after, the Montgomery County Inspector General raised further concerns, citing delivery delays and the district’s failure to recover $372,000 from Highland for buses that were not operational.
The state board’s 11-page report also referenced the criminal convictions of two former MCPS transportation officials, including an assistant director who stole more than $300,000 from the project. Their involvement, the board concluded, further “tainted” the procurement process.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't MCPS just be more competent?