Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid and I are putting together a spreadsheet of schools he's interested in. The reaches are places like UVA, Georgetown, USC (cal), Davidson.
W&M has high stats -- average GPA 4.4 (the highest on our list) and 1470 SAT (almost the highest). But its acceptance rate is reported at 32%, nearly double UVA, Georgetown, and Vassar.
Why is this? Does it get a ton of applicants with very weighted GPAs? Does it not have as many casual applications like a UVA or Georgetown?
Trying to figure out how much of a target vs. reach this is for my kid and those conflicting numbers confuse me.
Weighted gpa means nothing; throw that out. If anything, it tells you that kids from Virginia have inflated GPAs.
The SAT column is only meaningful if you add a column: percentage of class submitting scores. For instance, Georgetown requires them.
Finally, the acceptance rate column is only meaningful if you add a column showing if there are ED rounds, and if you in-state or not etc. ED lowers acceptance rates.
Georgetown, for instance, has no ED; it is by far the toughest admit of any schools you have mentioned, all of which have ED.
Hope this helps!
Anonymous wrote:Because it's kind of known as a nerdy school and not everyone wants their college experience to be in the middle of a 1700s living history museum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid and I are putting together a spreadsheet of schools he's interested in. The reaches are places like UVA, Georgetown, USC (cal), Davidson.
W&M has high stats -- average GPA 4.4 (the highest on our list) and 1470 SAT (almost the highest). But its acceptance rate is reported at 32%, nearly double UVA, Georgetown, and Vassar.
Why is this? Does it get a ton of applicants with very weighted GPAs? Does it not have as many casual applications like a UVA or Georgetown?
Trying to figure out how much of a target vs. reach this is for my kid and those conflicting numbers confuse me.
Weighted gpa means nothing; throw that out. If anything, it tells you that kids from Virginia have inflated GPAs.
The SAT column is only meaningful if you add a column: percentage of class submitting scores. For instance, Georgetown requires them.
Finally, the acceptance rate column is only meaningful if you add a column showing if there are ED rounds, and if you in-state or not etc. ED lowers acceptance rates.
Georgetown, for instance, has no ED; it is by far the toughest admit of any schools you have mentioned, all of which have ED.
Hope this helps!
Anonymous wrote:Because it's kind of known as a nerdy school and not everyone wants their college experience to be in the middle of a 1700s living history museum.
Anonymous wrote:My kid and I are putting together a spreadsheet of schools he's interested in. The reaches are places like UVA, Georgetown, USC (cal), Davidson.
W&M has high stats -- average GPA 4.4 (the highest on our list) and 1470 SAT (almost the highest). But its acceptance rate is reported at 32%, nearly double UVA, Georgetown, and Vassar.
Why is this? Does it get a ton of applicants with very weighted GPAs? Does it not have as many casual applications like a UVA or Georgetown?
Trying to figure out how much of a target vs. reach this is for my kid and those conflicting numbers confuse me.
Anonymous wrote:Because it's kind of known as a nerdy school and not everyone wants their college experience to be in the middle of a 1700s living history museum.
Anonymous wrote:Self selecting applicants, and a ton of the class is admitted via ED1 and ED2.