Anonymous
11/26/2025 17:32
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No disrespect intended toward you. This firm is essentially a group of cover up specialist. Some of their conduct is potentially a violation of the rules of professional conduct and actually has potential criminal implications. If Aleta law is reading this they're welcome to sue me. We can see who's telling the truth and who's lying
I am so sorry about what you experienced at camp and in the school’s response. The school is not truthful and covers up everything. Please suggest a private way to connect people.
Didn't attend this camp. Just familiar with this firm and some of the DISTURBING conduct they engaged in at a boarding school in New England. Frankly, these people shouldn't be licensed to practice law. They essentially protected a head of school and board chair who knowingly protected a pedophile
Anonymous
11/25/2025 20:05
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:Look up most any child care facility on that site and you will see some violation so Congressional camp shouldn’t be singled out. The link also says the complaint was not valid
and doesn’t mention abuse.
“Intensive Plan of Correction”? Repeat violations are not a good look. Congressional’s problem is systemic. Stop trying to hide and downplay it.
Anonymous
11/03/2025 17:38
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:No disrespect intended toward you. This firm is essentially a group of cover up specialist. Some of their conduct is potentially a violation of the rules of professional conduct and actually has potential criminal implications. If Aleta law is reading this they're welcome to sue me. We can see who's telling the truth and who's lying
I am so sorry about what you experienced at camp and in the school’s response. The school is not truthful and covers up everything. Please suggest a private way to connect people.
Anonymous
10/29/2025 14:39
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
No disrespect intended toward you. This firm is essentially a group of cover up specialist. Some of their conduct is potentially a violation of the rules of professional conduct and actually has potential criminal implications. If Aleta law is reading this they're welcome to sue me. We can see who's telling the truth and who's lying
Anonymous
10/28/2025 20:42
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:Are you seriously suggesting calling Aleta law? This firm has engaged in conduct that I can only describe as deeply disturbing and unethical. These "lawyers" have a history of making knowingly false statements
This is the law firm Congressional hired to investigate for them and was sent to parents for them to contact. They must not be serious in learning about problems based on what you are saying. How can parents connect to share stories and collect information? This issue sounds more widespread than the email relayed.
Anonymous
10/28/2025 19:46
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Are you seriously suggesting calling Aleta law? This firm has engaged in conduct that I can only describe as deeply disturbing and unethical. These "lawyers" have a history of making knowingly false statements
Anonymous
10/27/2025 18:10
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:Congressional Camp has a reputation - it's older kids and counselors that are the perpetrators so it would not be found in the VA DSS database. If you live in Arlington, you can look through the MONA archives to find information on past instances, unless it's been scrubbed.
This is really disturbing. The same counselors work at the school and babysit. Please contact the lawyers if you have information from any allegation made in the past no matter how long ago. Call ALETA LAW
Anonymous
10/26/2025 11:44
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Congressional Camp has a reputation - it's older kids and counselors that are the perpetrators so it would not be found in the VA DSS database. If you live in Arlington, you can look through the MONA archives to find information on past instances, unless it's been scrubbed.
Anonymous
10/26/2025 10:55
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The report says 'The preponderance of evidence gathered during the investigation does not support the allegations; therefore, the complaint is determined to be not valid.'
As a parent of a young camper, I would feel better if the report said there was no evidence. Could this mean it could be a he/she said problem?!??
The report also says the complaint was “relating to allegations in the areas of staffing and supervision, staff qualification and training, and programs” — which doesn’t sound like abuse.
Either OP has info about something else entirely or has completely misrepresented the situation.
Not OP but received email referenced in 1st post.The HOS sent mass email informing that an allegation from July was referred to CPS and found not valid. The school provided a law firm POC to gather more info from all campers and provided resources to talk to kids about sex safety. I dont remember any info about no bakground check and licensure.
Anonymous
10/24/2025 21:48
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:The report says 'The preponderance of evidence gathered during the investigation does not support the allegations; therefore, the complaint is determined to be not valid.'
As a parent of a young camper, I would feel better if the report said there was no evidence. Could this mean it could be a he/she said problem?!??
The report also says the complaint was “relating to allegations in the areas of staffing and supervision, staff qualification and training, and programs” — which doesn’t sound like abuse.
Either OP has info about something else entirely or has completely misrepresented the situation.
Anonymous
10/24/2025 19:29
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
The report says 'The preponderance of evidence gathered during the investigation does not support the allegations; therefore, the complaint is determined to be not valid.'
As a parent of a young camper, I would feel better if the report said there was no evidence. Could this mean it could be a he/she said problem?!??
As a parent of a young camper, I would feel better if the report said there was no evidence. Could this mean it could be a he/she said problem?!??
Anonymous
10/24/2025 19:03
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Anonymous wrote:I found this:
www.dss.virginia.gov/facility/search/cc2.cgi?rm=Inspection;Inspection=168278;ID=8297;
"The center conducted a summer program for approximately 250 children ages 4 to 12 years enrolled at an off-site satellite location for four weeks that was not approved under the terms of the current license issued by the department."
***
REPEAT VIOLATION:
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
Staff #2, employed for eight years, did not have documentation of requesting a central registry check from one state.
I would have thought with the cost of those camps they could afford someone to do background checks and licensing.
Anonymous
10/24/2025 06:10
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Look up most any child care facility on that site and you will see some violation so Congressional camp shouldn’t be singled out. The link also says the complaint was not valid
and doesn’t mention abuse.
and doesn’t mention abuse.
Anonymous
10/23/2025 21:07
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
I found this:
www.dss.virginia.gov/facility/search/cc2.cgi?rm=Inspection;Inspection=168278;ID=8297;
"The center conducted a summer program for approximately 250 children ages 4 to 12 years enrolled at an off-site satellite location for four weeks that was not approved under the terms of the current license issued by the department."
***
REPEAT VIOLATION:
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
Staff #2, employed for eight years, did not have documentation of requesting a central registry check from one state.
www.dss.virginia.gov/facility/search/cc2.cgi?rm=Inspection;Inspection=168278;ID=8297;
"The center conducted a summer program for approximately 250 children ages 4 to 12 years enrolled at an off-site satellite location for four weeks that was not approved under the terms of the current license issued by the department."
***
REPEAT VIOLATION:
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
Staff #2, employed for eight years, did not have documentation of requesting a central registry check from one state.
Anonymous
10/12/2025 18:27
Subject: Congressional Camp Abuse
Does anyone have more information about the email that was sent out?