Anonymous wrote:The age verification for the big adult sites isn’t doing much to stop children from accessing porn. Sketchy sites and sites that host stuff other than adult content (Discord, Reddit, even Twitter) don’t ask for any kind of ID upload.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m an adult and I don’t click on websites that require age verification so yea they’re chilling free speech

Online is not "free speech"

Every website has Terms of Service you sign them and should read them. Oh wait Americans are too dumb to read what they sign.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone,
I’ve been keeping an eye on some evolving trends in online content access and consumption that have me rethinking things, and I wanted to open up a discussion here in the local politics section to gauge what y’all are seeing, especially with Virginia’s landscape in mind.

First, let’s dive into the big push for age verification laws across the US. As of October 2025, 25 states have rolled out requirements for sites hosting adult-oriented material to verify users’ ages—think uploading IDs, using apps for checks, or even linking to payment methods. This started with pioneers like Louisiana in 2023 and has snowballed to include heavy hitters like Texas, Florida, Virginia, Utah, and more recently Ohio (which just kicked in last month) and Missouri (set for next month).

The idea is to shield kids from inappropriate stuff, which sounds noble on paper, but it’s sparking major debates on privacy risks—do we really want to hand over personal info just to browse? Some platforms are straight-up geo-blocking these states instead of complying, cutting off access for everyone. And with ongoing lawsuits in places like Texas challenging the constitutionality on free speech grounds, it’s a hot mess.

Here in Virginia, our own SB 1515 (passed 2023) is part of this wave, and with the gubernatorial race looming on November 4 between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, I’m wondering—do you think this law will change if Democrats win the Virginia governor race? Are you alarmed by how this is spreading? If you’re in Virginia, has it changed how you access online entertainment or info? Or do you see it as an overdue safeguard? Spill your thoughts—I’m curious about real-world impacts here locally.

Now, on a related but more personal note, another trend that’s been frustrating me is what feels like a “bait and switch” in the content I consume. I go in expecting to see bona fide (cisgender) women, in scenarios marketed as straightforward heterosexual setups, only to realize it’s transgender women presenting as cis.

It’s disappointing because it doesn’t align with what I anticipated based on the labeling or promotion, and it leaves me feeling misled. Anyone else noticing this shift and finding it jarring? Is it alarming to you, or am I making too much of it? I’d love to hear if you’ve encountered similar surprises in your media or entertainment habits—maybe mismatches in representation that threw you off?

How has it affected what you choose to watch or engage with? Let’s chat about it civilly; no judgment, just sharing experiences to see if this is a broader thing.
Looking forward to your thoughts—do you expect anything to change if dems take back governor?

The bill was passed by a Democrat controlled legislature. This wasn't some executive order.

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone,
I’ve been keeping an eye on some evolving trends in online content access and consumption that have me rethinking things, and I wanted to open up a discussion here in the local politics section to gauge what y’all are seeing, especially with Virginia’s landscape in mind.

First, let’s dive into the big push for age verification laws across the US. As of October 2025, 25 states have rolled out requirements for sites hosting adult-oriented material to verify users’ ages—think uploading IDs, using apps for checks, or even linking to payment methods. This started with pioneers like Louisiana in 2023 and has snowballed to include heavy hitters like Texas, Florida, Virginia, Utah, and more recently Ohio (which just kicked in last month) and Missouri (set for next month).

The idea is to shield kids from inappropriate stuff, which sounds noble on paper, but it’s sparking major debates on privacy risks—do we really want to hand over personal info just to browse? Some platforms are straight-up geo-blocking these states instead of complying, cutting off access for everyone. And with ongoing lawsuits in places like Texas challenging the constitutionality on free speech grounds, it’s a hot mess.

Here in Virginia, our own SB 1515 (passed 2023) is part of this wave, and with the gubernatorial race looming on November 4 between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, I’m wondering—do you think this law will change if Democrats win the Virginia governor race? Are you alarmed by how this is spreading? If you’re in Virginia, has it changed how you access online entertainment or info? Or do you see it as an overdue safeguard? Spill your thoughts—I’m curious about real-world impacts here locally.

Now, on a related but more personal note, another trend that’s been frustrating me is what feels like a “bait and switch” in the content I consume. I go in expecting to see bona fide (cisgender) women, in scenarios marketed as straightforward heterosexual setups, only to realize it’s transgender women presenting as cis.

It’s disappointing because it doesn’t align with what I anticipated based on the labeling or promotion, and it leaves me feeling misled. Anyone else noticing this shift and finding it jarring? Is it alarming to you, or am I making too much of it? I’d love to hear if you’ve encountered similar surprises in your media or entertainment habits—maybe mismatches in representation that threw you off?

How has it affected what you choose to watch or engage with? Let’s chat about it civilly; no judgment, just sharing experiences to see if this is a broader thing.
Looking forward to your thoughts—do you expect anything to change if dems take back governor?

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone,
I’ve been keeping an eye on some evolving trends in online content access and consumption that have me rethinking things, and I wanted to open up a discussion here in the local politics section to gauge what y’all are seeing, especially with Virginia’s landscape in mind.

First, let’s dive into the big push for age verification laws across the US. As of October 2025, 25 states have rolled out requirements for sites hosting adult-oriented material to verify users’ ages—think uploading IDs, using apps for checks, or even linking to payment methods. This started with pioneers like Louisiana in 2023 and has snowballed to include heavy hitters like Texas, Florida, Virginia, Utah, and more recently Ohio (which just kicked in last month) and Missouri (set for next month).

The idea is to shield kids from inappropriate stuff, which sounds noble on paper, but it’s sparking major debates on privacy risks—do we really want to hand over personal info just to browse? Some platforms are straight-up geo-blocking these states instead of complying, cutting off access for everyone. And with ongoing lawsuits in places like Texas challenging the constitutionality on free speech grounds, it’s a hot mess.

Here in Virginia, our own SB 1515 (passed 2023) is part of this wave, and with the gubernatorial race looming on November 4 between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, I’m wondering—do you think this law will change if Democrats win the Virginia governor race? Are you alarmed by how this is spreading? If you’re in Virginia, has it changed how you access online entertainment or info? Or do you see it as an overdue safeguard? Spill your thoughts—I’m curious about real-world impacts here locally.

Now, on a related but more personal note, another trend that’s been frustrating me is what feels like a “bait and switch” in the content I consume. I go in expecting to see bona fide (cisgender) women, in scenarios marketed as straightforward heterosexual setups, only to realize it’s transgender women presenting as cis.

It’s disappointing because it doesn’t align with what I anticipated based on the labeling or promotion, and it leaves me feeling misled. Anyone else noticing this shift and finding it jarring? Is it alarming to you, or am I making too much of it? I’d love to hear if you’ve encountered similar surprises in your media or entertainment habits—maybe mismatches in representation that threw you off?

How has it affected what you choose to watch or engage with? Let’s chat about it civilly; no judgment, just sharing experiences to see if this is a broader thing.
Looking forward to your thoughts—do you expect anything to change if dems take back governor?

Anonymous wrote:I’m an adult and I don’t click on websites that require age verification so yea they’re chilling free speech

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone,
I’ve been keeping an eye on some evolving trends in online content access and consumption that have me rethinking things, and I wanted to open up a discussion here in the local politics section to gauge what y’all are seeing, especially with Virginia’s landscape in mind.

First, let’s dive into the big push for age verification laws across the US. As of October 2025, 25 states have rolled out requirements for sites hosting adult-oriented material to verify users’ ages—think uploading IDs, using apps for checks, or even linking to payment methods. This started with pioneers like Louisiana in 2023 and has snowballed to include heavy hitters like Texas, Florida, Virginia, Utah, and more recently Ohio (which just kicked in last month) and Missouri (set for next month).

The idea is to shield kids from inappropriate stuff, which sounds noble on paper, but it’s sparking major debates on privacy risks—do we really want to hand over personal info just to browse? Some platforms are straight-up geo-blocking these states instead of complying, cutting off access for everyone. And with ongoing lawsuits in places like Texas challenging the constitutionality on free speech grounds, it’s a hot mess.

Here in Virginia, our own SB 1515 (passed 2023) is part of this wave, and with the gubernatorial race looming on November 4 between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, I’m wondering—do you think this law will change if Democrats win the Virginia governor race? Are you alarmed by how this is spreading? If you’re in Virginia, has it changed how you access online entertainment or info? Or do you see it as an overdue safeguard? Spill your thoughts—I’m curious about real-world impacts here locally.

Now, on a related but more personal note, another trend that’s been frustrating me is what feels like a “bait and switch” in the content I consume. I go in expecting to see bona fide (cisgender) women, in scenarios marketed as straightforward heterosexual setups, only to realize it’s transgender women presenting as cis.

It’s disappointing because it doesn’t align with what I anticipated based on the labeling or promotion, and it leaves me feeling misled. Anyone else noticing this shift and finding it jarring? Is it alarming to you, or am I making too much of it? I’d love to hear if you’ve encountered similar surprises in your media or entertainment habits—maybe mismatches in representation that threw you off?

How has it affected what you choose to watch or engage with? Let’s chat about it civilly; no judgment, just sharing experiences to see if this is a broader thing.
Looking forward to your thoughts—do you expect anything to change if dems take back governor?

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone,
I’ve been keeping an eye on some evolving trends in online content access and consumption that have me rethinking things, and I wanted to open up a discussion here in the local politics section to gauge what y’all are seeing, especially with Virginia’s landscape in mind.

First, let’s dive into the big push for age verification laws across the US. As of October 2025, 25 states have rolled out requirements for sites hosting adult-oriented material to verify users’ ages—think uploading IDs, using apps for checks, or even linking to payment methods. This started with pioneers like Louisiana in 2023 and has snowballed to include heavy hitters like Texas, Florida, Virginia, Utah, and more recently Ohio (which just kicked in last month) and Missouri (set for next month).

The idea is to shield kids from inappropriate stuff, which sounds noble on paper, but it’s sparking major debates on privacy risks—do we really want to hand over personal info just to browse? Some platforms are straight-up geo-blocking these states instead of complying, cutting off access for everyone. And with ongoing lawsuits in places like Texas challenging the constitutionality on free speech grounds, it’s a hot mess.

Here in Virginia, our own SB 1515 (passed 2023) is part of this wave, and with the gubernatorial race looming on November 4 between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears, I’m wondering—do you think this law will change if Democrats win the Virginia governor race? Are you alarmed by how this is spreading? If you’re in Virginia, has it changed how you access online entertainment or info? Or do you see it as an overdue safeguard? Spill your thoughts—I’m curious about real-world impacts here locally.

Now, on a related but more personal note, another trend that’s been frustrating me is what feels like a “bait and switch” in the content I consume. I go in expecting to see bona fide (cisgender) women, in scenarios marketed as straightforward heterosexual setups, only to realize it’s transgender women presenting as cis.

It’s disappointing because it doesn’t align with what I anticipated based on the labeling or promotion, and it leaves me feeling misled. Anyone else noticing this shift and finding it jarring? Is it alarming to you, or am I making too much of it? I’d love to hear if you’ve encountered similar surprises in your media or entertainment habits—maybe mismatches in representation that threw you off?

How has it affected what you choose to watch or engage with? Let’s chat about it civilly; no judgment, just sharing experiences to see if this is a broader thing.
Looking forward to your thoughts—do you expect anything to change if dems take back governor?