It’s sad that so many people are so late to understanding that the DCC is done.

The original options screwed some portions of the SCC. Where were all the Sligo/Takoma Park parents then? You ignored us because you thought you would stay at Einstein and/or continue to have choice in secondary schools.

Anonymous wrote:Sargent Shriver from Wheaton to Woodward, Farmland from Woodward to WJ. Move some Kensington kids from WJ into Einstein (if that makes Einstein too overcrowded, make small tweaks like maybe keeping the Flora Singer kids together and sending them to Northwood.) Move some kids from Kennedy into Wheaton to address overcrowding if needed. Done.

I don’t disagree with any of this but good lord, the ToK families who live thisclose to Einstein would throw a fit. Why the BOE won’t stand up to them is beyond me.

All that said, thank you, OP, for starting this thread. I’ve already submitted feedback to the survey a few times and have emailed Councilmembers. I know other parents at our schools are doing the same. I’m all for a larger organizing effort - it’s infuriating that yet again, the wealthiest communities are appeased.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone wrote the following in another thread anyone have an answer?: “Do these tables have an error for Northwood's future capacity? They say it's 2,260 (including new building in 2027), but everywhere else I've seen the new building's capacity reported at 2,700.

If there is an error, then all of these options would have NW's utilization at 70-80%.”

If that's the case then capacity utilization should be a non-issue. Some shifting can happen to balance.

It's not the case. The 2260 number for Northwood is correct and is listed in the current MCPS CIP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DCC response rate was very low in the last survey. I hope that will change. But to me it seems like the loudest voices got their way.

Wait until next week and if somehow Wayside stays in Churchill, then you know for sure that the loudest voices are the only ones they are taking into consideration (wayside goes to Wootton is all 4 previous options and they have been LOUD).

Both are low FARM and equally good school. I don't get the logic of a loud protest here.

Anonymous wrote:Someone wrote the following in another thread anyone have an answer?: “Do these tables have an error for Northwood's future capacity? They say it's 2,260 (including new building in 2027), but everywhere else I've seen the new building's capacity reported at 2,700.

If there is an error, then all of these options would have NW's utilization at 70-80%.”

If that's the case then capacity utilization should be a non-issue. Some shifting can happen to balance.

Someone wrote the following in another thread anyone have an answer?: “Do these tables have an error for Northwood's future capacity? They say it's 2,260 (including new building in 2027), but everywhere else I've seen the new building's capacity reported at 2,700.

If there is an error, then all of these options would have NW's utilization at 70-80%.”

Sargent Shriver from Wheaton to Woodward, Farmland from Woodward to WJ. Move some Kensington kids from WJ into Einstein (if that makes Einstein too overcrowded, make small tweaks like maybe keeping the Flora Singer kids together and sending them to Northwood.) Move some kids from Kennedy into Wheaton to address overcrowding if needed. Done.

Anonymous wrote:The DCC response rate was very low in the last survey. I hope that will change. But to me it seems like the loudest voices got their way.

Wait until next week and if somehow Wayside stays in Churchill, then you know for sure that the loudest voices are the only ones they are taking into consideration (wayside goes to Wootton is all 4 previous options and they have been LOUD).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's hard to summarize simply, but basically you need to move everyone a little counter-clockwise.

Move some of Wheaton to Woodward (and maybe some Kennedy to Wheaton if needed to relieve overcrowding at Kennedy), some of Woodward to WJ, and Kensington from WJ to Einstein.

Some portion of kennedy to Woodward.
All GP to Woodward.
Viers Mill ES to WJ
Kensington from WJ to Einstein.

it will allow Kensington to atten closer school and less bussing.
It will create WJ and Woodward at roughly equal FARMS rate.
It will also keep Enstein FARMS to go very high.

I like the Idea. It will also avoid split articualtion for GP ES.

Anonymous wrote:It's hard to summarize simply, but basically you need to move everyone a little counter-clockwise.

Move some of Wheaton to Woodward (and maybe some Kennedy to Wheaton if needed to relieve overcrowding at Kennedy), some of Woodward to WJ, and Kensington from WJ to Einstein.

Some portion of kennedy to Woodward.
All GP to Woodward.
Viers Mill ES to WJ
Kensington from WJ to Einstein.

it will allow Kensington to atten closer school and less bussing.
It will create WJ and Woodward at roughly equal FARMS rate.
It will also keep Enstein FARMS to go very high.

Anonymous wrote:The DCC response rate was very low in the last survey. I hope that will change. But to me it seems like the loudest voices got their way.

I thought why bother, mcps and the BOE don’t care.

It's hard to summarize simply, but basically you need to move everyone a little counter-clockwise.

Move some of Wheaton to Woodward (and maybe some Kennedy to Wheaton if needed to relieve overcrowding at Kennedy), some of Woodward to WJ, and Kensington from WJ to Einstein.

Anonymous wrote:The DCC response rate was very low in the last survey. I hope that will change. But to me it seems like the loudest voices got their way.

Yep. So how do we become louder? They will force this on us if we're not.

The DCC response rate was very low in the last survey. I hope that will change. But to me it seems like the loudest voices got their way.

Looking at the boundary options, it's pretty clear that all 4 of them benefit BCC, WJ, and Whitman at the expense of DCC schools. Their boundaries barely change (except WJ which gets Woodward as basically a WJ overflow school) whereas DCC boundaries change a lot. They have almost no split articulation (just Garrett Park and Kensington-Parkwood) while DCC schools have tons. Some DCC schools will remain overcrowded in some of these options, but their schools will not. It seems like they basically decided to give those schools everything they want and then let DCC families argue amongst ourselves for or against certain options that benefit some DCC neighborhoods and schools more than others.

How do we push back against this?

1) Process-wise: are there any efforts to bring DCC families together around our shared interests on this boundary study, rather than just focusing within our neighborhoods and schools on which of the options we prefer (which we will inevitably disagree on because different options are better for different schools)? I would love to find somewhere to plug in on this.
2) Substance-wise: are there some specific changes we can come together to argue for? Do folks see any obvious changes we can push for (i.e. "Option X amended by moving A elementary to B high school and Y elementary to Z high school")? It is frustrating that we have to do this ourselves since this set of options should have included at least some that were fairer to DCC schools and then we could have argued things out from there-- but we are where we are, so practically speaking, I think we need to come up with our own amended version of one of these proposals (or one of the earlier round of proposals) if we want to have any hope of changing anything. Do folks have suggestions?