Anonymous wrote:My DC was very similar unhooked high stats kid but with stronger EC's (leadership, couple of national awards). He did not want to ED, had a pretty allergic reaction to it. The discussions around this with him were the most interesting of the college process. Turns out my kid has a totally different risk profile (at least at this age) than his parents. He valued regret minimization (i.e. never knowing what could have been and feeling that he settled) over risk minimization of ED and getting in to say UChicago.
I think the kid has to make the final call but have a serious discussion with them using the negative outcomes of each path, i.e. you get in to your ED but then your friend with lower stats gets in RD to your real dream school or you don't ED and then everyone else gets in and is done, your spend 4 more months in limbo and end up at a school no better than where you probably could have gotten in ED?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the high stats poster from a few posts down. I'd also like to know the answer to this question. Does ED matter for UVA or other in-state flagships when student is at the top of scattergram stats?
Yes, it matters a lot for UVA. Likely to be even more important this year with no supplemental essays and an expected uptick in EA and RD applications.
Anonymous wrote:this is why i want them to ed, we will be full pay no matter what, and due to this why not use to our advantage
Anonymous wrote:I'm the high stats poster from a few posts down. I'd also like to know the answer to this question. Does ED matter for UVA or other in-state flagships when student is at the top of scattergram stats?
Anonymous wrote:My DC was very similar unhooked high stats kid but with stronger EC's (leadership, couple of national awards). He did not want to ED, had a pretty allergic reaction to it. The discussions around this with him were the most interesting of the college process. Turns out my kid has a totally different risk profile (at least at this age) than his parents. He valued regret minimization (i.e. never knowing what could have been and feeling that he settled) over risk minimization of ED and getting in to say UChicago.
I think the kid has to make the final call but have a serious discussion with them using the negative outcomes of each path, i.e. you get in to your ED but then your friend with lower stats gets in RD to your real dream school or you don't ED and then everyone else gets in and is done, your spend 4 more months in limbo and end up at a school no better than where you probably could have gotten in ED?
Anonymous wrote:this is why i want them to ed, we will be full pay no matter what, and due to this why not use to our advantage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not push a kid to commit/ ED when he is not on board.
The only reason to do so would be to maximize the chances that the kid is accepted at the highest prestige place possible.
Is prestige really your most valued outcome?
i dont but my kid does lol
Anonymous wrote:I would not push a kid to commit/ ED when he is not on board.
The only reason to do so would be to maximize the chances that the kid is accepted at the highest prestige place possible.
Is prestige really your most valued outcome?