Anonymous wrote:Right. It’s generative — so it’s really really good at making something from nothing — and really helps when the empty page is the problem.
It also tells us what we want to hear and makes shit up — so it’s an ok starting point, but then be sure to step away

Ive been using GPT-5 paid version and its better than it use to be. Set up a project with instructions to be a critical/jaded AO that speaks with brutal honesty. It's trained on a ton of information from reddit, forums, interviews, school websites, etc. So while it's a 'word completion' model its predictions are based on its training. Plus you can ingest data and play with that as well.
But, yes, one has to remember its not 'thinking'. It's a model. It does get hung up on certain outputs or regurgitate stereotypes unless challenged but its gets better output after refining prompts. So to your point, it can enhance ones research, but don't trust it blindly.