Anonymous wrote:There are people like him on both sides. The thing is, right now, only one side is being institutionally oppressed. Which means that violence is going to flare up, because of a perceived sense of injustice.
So be careful.
Anonymous wrote:There are people like him on both sides. The thing is, right now, only one side is being institutionally oppressed. Which means that violence is going to flare up, because of a perceived sense of injustice.
So be careful.
Anonymous wrote:Today, I choose violence. Literally.
I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon. The issue is … I simply don’t care.
..
It’s all about cost, and the cost is not high enough.
In some places, the cost is nonexistent. We need to reinstitute a public debt for anti-social and subversive behavior. In my opinion, some of this cost needs to be summary and ultra-violent.
Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is.
...
We must stop clutching our principles and shouting “stop.” They own the legal system. That will achieve nothing. We need action. Disproportionate. Violent. Action.
Pain and suffering.
We need to raise the cost of obviating the social contract. Measure it in blood if necessary. Change requires pain, and you’re either taking it or inflicting it.
I know which side I’m on, and I’m more than ready to start putting people in the shed.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/26/ingersoll-enough-choose-violence-police-crime-crackdown/
So is anyone going to cancel Ingersoll? Will he be removed or fired from any of his plush right wing patronages? Will the government come in and shut him down? Will there be investigations in to who fund him?
No. He will be cheered and applauded by every national Republican, all the right wing media and right wing social ecosystem.
This is everything the kirkits were fake screaming about.
Anonymous wrote:So if Ingersoll is the 1st victim “in the shed” y’all ok with that?
Anonymous wrote:OP is right - if this had been written by the editor at large of the New Republic, or Mother Jones, or Slate, every Democratic elected official would condemn this and he would be fired in an hour. Has anyone said anything about this by the editor at large of the Daily Caller?
Anonymous wrote:So if Ingersoll is the 1st victim “in the shed” y’all ok with that?
Anonymous wrote:Today, I choose violence. Literally.
I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon. The issue is … I simply don’t care.
..
It’s all about cost, and the cost is not high enough.
In some places, the cost is nonexistent. We need to reinstitute a public debt for anti-social and subversive behavior. In my opinion, some of this cost needs to be summary and ultra-violent.
Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is.
...
We must stop clutching our principles and shouting “stop.” They own the legal system. That will achieve nothing. We need action. Disproportionate. Violent. Action.
Pain and suffering.
We need to raise the cost of obviating the social contract. Measure it in blood if necessary. Change requires pain, and you’re either taking it or inflicting it.
I know which side I’m on, and I’m more than ready to start putting people in the shed.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/26/ingersoll-enough-choose-violence-police-crime-crackdown/
So is anyone going to cancel Ingersoll? Will he be removed or fired from any of his plush right wing patronages? Will the government come in and shut him down? Will there be investigations in to who fund him?
No. He will be cheered and applauded by every national Republican, all the right wing media and right wing social ecosystem.
This is everything the kirkits were fake screaming about.
Today, I choose violence. Literally.
I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon. The issue is … I simply don’t care.
..
It’s all about cost, and the cost is not high enough.
In some places, the cost is nonexistent. We need to reinstitute a public debt for anti-social and subversive behavior. In my opinion, some of this cost needs to be summary and ultra-violent.
Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is.
...
We must stop clutching our principles and shouting “stop.” They own the legal system. That will achieve nothing. We need action. Disproportionate. Violent. Action.
Pain and suffering.
We need to raise the cost of obviating the social contract. Measure it in blood if necessary. Change requires pain, and you’re either taking it or inflicting it.
I know which side I’m on, and I’m more than ready to start putting people in the shed.