Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Lol they were tied for 24th with Emory last year and now are one spot behind. No difference. They’re peers. UVA just costs less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Yep
So let me get this straight: that US News moves UVA out of the 3 way tie for 24th and now says it’s 26th makes all the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Yep
Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Anonymous wrote:Who cares? USNWR's methodology is suss and data is often inflated by schools.
Why are we looking to a magazine to tell us what to think?
UVA is a great school whether it's #23 or #26 on a silly ranking system.
Think for yourself people!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Lol they were tied for 24th with Emory last year and now are one spot behind. No difference. They’re peers. UVA just costs less.
Its 2 spots and we know you're bitter bout it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.
Lol they were tied for 24th with Emory last year and now are one spot behind. No difference. They’re peers. UVA just costs less.
Anonymous wrote:UVa boosters made a thread to bash Emory, WashU and other schools yesterday. Calling them pseudo prestigious. Funny how things work out.