Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve always read that for most people it’s waste of money to pay for a financial planner that charges a % based commission and that you should go flat fee. I have a family member who told me they’re going with a commission based financial planner charging slightly below 1%. I was kind of surprised to hear this because from knowing them they’re already fairly money savvy on their own and this goes against most advice I’ve read. I don’t know their net worth but I have a rough ballpark and it’s probably $5M give or take.
They told me for their situation going with this particular financial planner seems like a good idea, the person has good reviews, they expect to get slightly better returns than the S&P 500 with active investment decisions, and they can get help with tax advice. What do you think? I personally wouldn’t but maybe there’s a good reason I’m not aware of? I didn’t want to pry too much so I limited my questions during our visit.
My fund manager earns every penny of his 2 and and 20.
Anonymous wrote:DP. Im trying to understand difference between “fee based” and “commission based” here. So fee based typically are paid via AUM and commission based are paid when they sell you a product?
A quick google search shows fee based advisors can be fiduciaries while commission based typically are not. If that’s correct, that’s a big deal to me.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve always read that for most people it’s waste of money to pay for a financial planner that charges a % based commission and that you should go flat fee. I have a family member who told me they’re going with a commission based financial planner charging slightly below 1%. I was kind of surprised to hear this because from knowing them they’re already fairly money savvy on their own and this goes against most advice I’ve read. I don’t know their net worth but I have a rough ballpark and it’s probably $5M give or take.
They told me for their situation going with this particular financial planner seems like a good idea, the person has good reviews, they expect to get slightly better returns than the S&P 500 with active investment decisions, and they can get help with tax advice. What do you think? I personally wouldn’t but maybe there’s a good reason I’m not aware of? I didn’t want to pry too much so I limited my questions during our visit.