Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.
Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.
Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.
Anonymous wrote:I weighed where to put this and decided it was best in politics.
So apparently the right is trying to manufacture a new cultural war controversy: It has persuaded itself liberals are triggered and Big Mad about sorority rush videos, especially at white sororities.
The original piece is in The Atlantic but that’s behind a paywall. This is an article about the article that had the added benefit of being written in Singapore so we get an outside-the-US perspective:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/conservatives-white-sorority-rush-videos_n_689f713fe4b0fd906c863d5b?utm_campaign=yahoo-recirc
I guess anything to distract from the Epstein files, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:I weighed where to put this and decided it was best in politics.
So apparently the right is trying to manufacture a new cultural war controversy: It has persuaded itself liberals are triggered and Big Mad about sorority rush videos, especially at white sororities.
The original piece is in The Atlantic but that’s behind a paywall. This is an article about the article that had the added benefit of being written in Singapore so we get an outside-the-US perspective:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/conservatives-white-sorority-rush-videos_n_689f713fe4b0fd906c863d5b?utm_campaign=yahoo-recirc
I guess anything to distract from the Epstein files, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
Anonymous wrote:Few people give a shit about any of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
But that’s just it: The left isn’t taking the bait.
It doesn't matter if the left takes the bait - the right just has to act like they did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
But that’s just it: The left isn’t taking the bait.
Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.
Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.