Idk but I thought the WHC OBs were great so maybe you can use them instead?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

Yes, compared to someone who has not had a csection; not necessarily when compared to a repeat c-section...

+100000 I regret my TOLAC so much

I don’t think you understand this poster - she’s saying TOLAC >> repeat C. Of course repeat vaginal birth is the lowest risk but it’s not a choice if you’ve had a C-section.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

Yes, compared to someone who has not had a csection; not necessarily when compared to a repeat c-section...

+100000 I regret my TOLAC so much

These are Google reviews OP, not a statement of policy. The midwives could have just determined that one patient was too high risk for them (maybe they had repeated Cs or additional risk factors like placenta previa) and the patient took to Yelp to complain.

Anonymous wrote:The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

But you're already giving birth IN a hospital? (with WHC midwives, i mean)

Anonymous wrote:The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

Yes, compared to someone who has not had a csection; not necessarily when compared to a repeat c-section...

Anonymous wrote:The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

I mean, yes, but if you’ve had a C-section and are pregnant again, in many cases a trial of labor is going to be lower risk than a repeat C.

The statistics don't lie. A previous C-section is correlated with higher risk of complications with attempted V delivery.

I know somebody personally who just VBACed with the midwives at MWHC within the last 2 weeks.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know the reason, but if you want a vbac, go to GW. I had a vba2c there earlier this year and can’t say enough good things about how supportive everyone was.

Seconding this recommendation. They were incredibly supportive of VBACs, I also had a great experience.

OBs don’t like midwives.

Probably their insurance

I don’t know the reason, but if you want a vbac, go to GW. I had a vba2c there earlier this year and can’t say enough good things about how supportive everyone was.

I just read a Google review that the Washington Hospital Center midwives are no longer providing care to patients with a C-section history. I googled it and found a reddit post saying the same thing. Does anyone know the reason for this?