. They argue that some campuses (in, say, Cambridge and Morningside Heights) and departments (much of the humanities) have leaned too far into leftist ideology and allowed anti-Semitism to fester under the guise of protesting Israeli policies. They want the American public to know that they are different from the Ivies. And they think that higher education needs new representation if it’s going to regain the country’s trust.
Are Vanderbilt and WUSTL unaware of their own scholars, who are mostly liberal, and that their own humanities departments engage in the same behavior? It honestly sounds like the WUSTL and Vanderbilt president are deeply insecure that they don't get to lead Harvard or Columbia. I'm surprised this behavior is so clear in a president of higher education.