Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to be able to touch the net.
With one hand or two?
I don't think there's a lot of leeway academically for basketball players at WashU or CMU. This is not Duke or Michigan. They'll be bright kids who were good players in high school, but not D1 standouts. And there's a million good students and basketball players who didn't grow up to be 6'7. So I would expect WashU and CMU players to be pretty smart - certainly enough to handle the normal course work. CMU and WashU are not in significant conferences, so with the way things are going, it's more like club sports. And would pursue accordingly. No dumbass is playing there. But it's a definite boost on an app.
Would reach out to the coaches if this a good student with some demonstrable skills.
This is an example of how you say that you know nothing about college sports and recruiting with directly saying that you know nothing about D3 sports or recruiting in general.
The UAA is one of the most competitive D3 conferences in the country (along with the NESCAC.) and the level of athletic talent is high. There will be some D1 caliber athletes on every team. Every player isn't D1 caliber but you find plenty of kids who were targeting Ivies but didn't quite make it and fell back to high academic D3 rather than lower academic mid-major D1 schools.
Anonymous wrote:For Carnegie Mellon or WashU? In terms of academic requirements. Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can look up the bios of the players for those schools and similarly situated Division III schools (e.g. Johns Hopkins, UChicago, etc.).
Being great enough at basketball to be recruited is going to be the hard part. Even at these schools, the players were generally All-State-level high school basketball players or competed with them in AAU programs. These aren’t just “smart kids who happen to play basketball on the side”. They are “elite basketball players that are also smart.” You can say that about recruited athletes in virtually any sport at the high academic Division III schools.
Wouldn't call D3 basketball players "elite"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to be able to touch the net.
With one hand or two?
I don't think there's a lot of leeway academically for basketball players at WashU or CMU. This is not Duke or Michigan. They'll be bright kids who were good players in high school, but not D1 standouts. And there's a million good students and basketball players who didn't grow up to be 6'7. So I would expect WashU and CMU players to be pretty smart - certainly enough to handle the normal course work. CMU and WashU are not in significant conferences, so with the way things are going, it's more like club sports. And would pursue accordingly. No dumbass is playing there. But it's a definite boost on an app.
Would reach out to the coaches if this a good student with some demonstrable skills.
Anonymous wrote:You can look up the bios of the players for those schools and similarly situated Division III schools (e.g. Johns Hopkins, UChicago, etc.).
Being great enough at basketball to be recruited is going to be the hard part. Even at these schools, the players were generally All-State-level high school basketball players or competed with them in AAU programs. These aren’t just “smart kids who happen to play basketball on the side”. They are “elite basketball players that are also smart.” You can say that about recruited athletes in virtually any sport at the high academic Division III schools.
Anonymous wrote:For Carnegie Mellon or WashU? In terms of academic requirements. Thanks
Anonymous wrote:For Carnegie Mellon or WashU? In terms of academic requirements. Thanks
Anonymous wrote:You need to be able to touch the net.
Anonymous wrote:For Carnegie Mellon or WashU? In terms of academic requirements. Thanks