Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would any of us know? DD said lots of girls showed up at her large public and so many got cut for the freshman team. There’s no point in posting the school because lots and so many aren’t specific numbers.
It looks like you know. I also know from my DD that Richard Montgomery had about 70 players trying out. Less players trying out for varsity (~25) with the rest trying out for JV. There were lots of players coming from clubs in the area: MVSA, Platform, MEVC. My DD thinks that players without club experience have little chance of making a team this year - even some club players may be cut.
RM won the state championship last year and they had a 24-1 record. Of course they’re composed of players with club experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would any of us know? DD said lots of girls showed up at her large public and so many got cut for the freshman team. There’s no point in posting the school because lots and so many aren’t specific numbers.
It looks like you know. I also know from my DD that Richard Montgomery had about 70 players trying out. Less players trying out for varsity (~25) with the rest trying out for JV. There were lots of players coming from clubs in the area: MVSA, Platform, MEVC. My DD thinks that players without club experience have little chance of making a team this year - even some club players may be cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would any of us know? DD said lots of girls showed up at her large public and so many got cut for the freshman team. There’s no point in posting the school because lots and so many aren’t specific numbers.
It looks like you know. I also know from my DD that Richard Montgomery had about 70 players trying out. Less players trying out for varsity (~25) with the rest trying out for JV. There were lots of players coming from clubs in the area: MVSA, Platform, MEVC. My DD thinks that players without club experience have little chance of making a team this year - even some club players may be cut.
Anonymous wrote:How would any of us know? DD said lots of girls showed up at her large public and so many got cut for the freshman team. There’s no point in posting the school because lots and so many aren’t specific numbers.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not just some abstract worry for me. Last summer my daughter was at a local volleyball camp and there was a biological boy from another girls team who spent the whole week stalking and harassing her. She told the staff multiple times and I even went to the host school myself. Instead of stepping in to protect her, they doubled down on protecting him because he identified as trans. They made it clear they were more afraid of being called “not inclusive” than they were concerned about a teenage girl’s safety.
So when I ask if boys are eligible for the girls roster, it’s because I’ve seen exactly how this kind of “inclusive” policy can play out in real life — and it’s not hypothetical for us.
Anonymous wrote:For those sharing numbers, can you also clarify if these are separate boys and girls teams or if it’s the “inclusive” setup where biological boys are eligible for the girls roster? It makes a difference when you’re talking about who actually has a shot at making the team.