Anonymous wrote:Europeans get significantly more vacation days and have better work life balance. France offers 7 weeks of paid vacation. The average 40-hour-per-week employee in the U.S. is working 400 more hours annually — the equivalent of 10 more weeks — than employees in Germany. But it is very American of you to feel bad for them because they don’t have a McMansion while you take your sad 3 weeks of vacation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sigh. Repeating for the people who think they are discovering something novel. The US is a terrible place to be poor but ok if you are rich (though that is getting to be debatable). Europe is a good place to be if you are middle income or poor. The rich try to shelter.
Europe still sucks to be poor, it’s just that more people are poor so you don’t feel as bad because everyone else is in the same boat. And it’s harder to become not poor. Reduced class mobility, more entrenched aristocratic wealth over there. They tax labor like crazy but barely touch capital generated income.
Anonymous wrote:Europeans get significantly more vacation days and have better work life balance. France offers 7 weeks of paid vacation. The average 40-hour-per-week employee in the U.S. is working 400 more hours annually — the equivalent of 10 more weeks — than employees in Germany. But it is very American of you to feel bad for them because they don’t have a McMansion while you take your sad 3 weeks of vacation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Flip side, even cashiers can have a nice life.
They have smaller houses, smaller cars, excellent weather compare to most of US. Cheap vacations across many countries and settings.
They don’t worry about being laid off at 50 and having to become a cashier who makes so little she is eligible for snap benefits.
Rewarding mediocrity doesn’t lead to prosperity in the long term. To an extent, an effective government needs to light a fire under people’s asses to achieve things in life. Coddling and enablement makes everyone poorer eventually
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Flip side, even cashiers can have a nice life.
They have smaller houses, smaller cars, excellent weather compare to most of US. Cheap vacations across many countries and settings.
They don’t worry about being laid off at 50 and having to become a cashier who makes so little she is eligible for snap benefits.
Rewarding mediocrity doesn’t lead to prosperity in the long term. To an extent, an effective government needs to light a fire under people’s asses to achieve things in life. Coddling and enablement makes everyone poorer eventually
Anonymous wrote:Sigh. Repeating for the people who think they are discovering something novel. The US is a terrible place to be poor but ok if you are rich (though that is getting to be debatable). Europe is a good place to be if you are middle income or poor. The rich try to shelter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sigh. Repeating for the people who think they are discovering something novel. The US is a terrible place to be poor but ok if you are rich (though that is getting to be debatable). Europe is a good place to be if you are middle income or poor. The rich try to shelter.
The US is a pretty good place to be poor compared to 90% of the world
Anonymous wrote:Sigh. Repeating for the people who think they are discovering something novel. The US is a terrible place to be poor but ok if you are rich (though that is getting to be debatable). Europe is a good place to be if you are middle income or poor. The rich try to shelter.
Anonymous wrote:Flip side, even cashiers can have a nice life.
They have smaller houses, smaller cars, excellent weather compare to most of US. Cheap vacations across many countries and settings.
They don’t worry about being laid off at 50 and having to become a cashier who makes so little she is eligible for snap benefits.