Anonymous wrote:Very interesting question.
It is easier for me to accept that AI will replace a lot of engineering functions, but I wonder whether AI can replace the creative aspect of Architecture.
Anonymous wrote:Architecture was always an abysmal career choice. Only the top 5%, maybe 1%, have a great outcome. The rest are glorified autocad monkeys and thus the dangers of AI. Many burn out and do something else. Some end up having lucrative careers after bailing out for real estate development or construction management or even facilities management (I know of one ex-architect who quickly lateralled to facilities management and is now a senior managing director with large accounts under him).
Best to browse architecture books and travel to beautiful cities than pursue a career in architecture.
Anonymous wrote:Architecture was always an abysmal career choice. Only the top 5%, maybe 1%, have a great outcome. The rest are glorified autocad monkeys and thus the dangers of AI. Many burn out and do something else. Some end up having lucrative careers after bailing out for real estate development or construction management or even facilities management (I know of one ex-architect who quickly lateralled to facilities management and is now a senior managing director with large accounts under him).
Best to browse architecture books and travel to beautiful cities than pursue a career in architecture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting question.
It is easier for me to accept that AI will replace a lot of engineering functions, but I wonder whether AI can replace the creative aspect of Architecture.
I actually believe the opposite. AI might generate a lot of creative ideas but you're going to need a real expert to confirm that the building will stand and prevent some occasional hallucination that would kill a lot of people.
Anonymous wrote:Very interesting question.
It is easier for me to accept that AI will replace a lot of engineering functions, but I wonder whether AI can replace the creative aspect of Architecture.
Anonymous wrote:Very interesting question.
It is easier for me to accept that AI will replace a lot of engineering functions, but I wonder whether AI can replace the creative aspect of Architecture.
Anonymous wrote:Architecture was always an abysmal career choice. Only the top 5%, maybe 1%, have a great outcome. The rest are glorified autocad monkeys and thus the dangers of AI. Many burn out and do something else. Some end up having lucrative careers after bailing out for real estate development or construction management or even facilities management (I know of one ex-architect who quickly lateralled to facilities management and is now a senior managing director with large accounts under him).
Best to browse architecture books and travel to beautiful cities than pursue a career in architecture.