Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you don’t get into T15, you probably also didn’t get into UVA. Then there is no much difference tuition wise between UM and Rochester. Both are attractive to many students.
So you are saying what… UVA is T15 like?
If you don’t get into UCLA OOS, you probably also get denied by UVA.
Please let's not turn this into another thread about comparing colleges. People way to sensitive with this stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you don’t get into T15, you probably also didn’t get into UVA. Then there is no much difference tuition wise between UM and Rochester. Both are attractive to many students.
So you are saying what… UVA is T15 like?
If you don’t get into UCLA OOS, you probably also get denied by UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don’t you just go to your state flagship, especially if it’s ranked in , say, the top 50? Tell me it makes no sense to pay all of that money for a private university that isn’t ranked in the top 15 or 20 when you could go to UVA, Michigan, North Carolina, maybe Florida, and obviously the UC schools?
Well, people that have instate Berkeley, UCLA, Michigan, Georgia Tech, and UT-Austin as options are in a wonderful place. And I suspect very few of those families can be persuaded to drop an additional $250,000 for undergrad at a different school.
But that's five schools out of 5000 colleges. There are a bazillion reasons why people choose something different than the state flagship. And for middle class families, the elite private schools are often cheaper than state flagships. Plus major strength, programs, vibe, network, opportunities, sports, location, community, weather, and on and on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you don’t get into T15, you probably also didn’t get into UVA. Then there is no much difference tuition wise between UM and Rochester. Both are attractive to many students.
So you are saying what… UVA is T15 like?
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t you just go to your state flagship, especially if it’s ranked in , say, the top 50? Tell me it makes no sense to pay all of that money for a private university that isn’t ranked in the top 15 or 20 when you could go to UVA, Michigan, North Carolina, maybe Florida, and obviously the UC schools?
I think it's to each their own. It whatever people put value on. It's different for everyone.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t you just go to your state flagship, especially if it’s ranked in , say, the top 50? Tell me it makes no sense to pay all of that money for a private university that isn’t ranked in the top 15 or 20 when you could go to UVA, Michigan, North Carolina, maybe Florida, and obviously the UC schools?
Anonymous wrote:When you don’t get into T15, you probably also didn’t get into UVA. Then there is no much difference tuition wise between UM and Rochester. Both are attractive to many students.
Anonymous wrote:Because my oldest wanted International Affairs. Georgetown and George Washington are both in the top 10 for that major. UMD, our in-state, is terrible.
He really liked GW's urban campus, so he went with that, and got some merit aid. Thankfully we can afford it.
For STEM, I agree that UMD would have been sufficient.