Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much are you willing to accept? If you want $160k, you will easily find a job. It's not hard for a former statiician from the UN to find someone to hire them for $160k.
We hired a 23 years old business analyst and handed her $125k. And she doesn't absolutely nothing NOTHING.
Listen it will come down to luck. I hope you are lucky like the inexperienced 23 years old we have $125k too just for editing PowerPoints and clicking cells in an excel spreadsheet.
I wish was the case. The US government is letting go of so many statisticians and they, including myself, are not finding much.
Yes, it has been absolutely brutal for statistical agencies and chief data officers’ staff. I wonder why they want to get rid of anyone who works with data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much are you willing to accept? If you want $160k, you will easily find a job. It's not hard for a former statiician from the UN to find someone to hire them for $160k.
We hired a 23 years old business analyst and handed her $125k. And she doesn't absolutely nothing NOTHING.
Listen it will come down to luck. I hope you are lucky like the inexperienced 23 years old we have $125k too just for editing PowerPoints and clicking cells in an excel spreadsheet.
I wish was the case. The US government is letting go of so many statisticians and they, including myself, are not finding much.
Anonymous wrote:How much are you willing to accept? If you want $160k, you will easily find a job. It's not hard for a former statiician from the UN to find someone to hire them for $160k.
We hired a 23 years old business analyst and handed her $125k. And she doesn't absolutely nothing NOTHING.
Listen it will come down to luck. I hope you are lucky like the inexperienced 23 years old we have $125k too just for editing PowerPoints and clicking cells in an excel spreadsheet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cold-applying to jobs is going to be a worse use of your time than expanding your skill set and meeting people. If you don't work in Python, start working with AI coding tools and build out your GitHub profile in an area that's connected to your specific statistical expertise.
OP here. I do use python and do have GitHub. But these skills are now standard. They are no longer a differentiator.
There's a lot of variation in terms of skill. But my point was, you're better off thinking about where your skill gaps are and filling them in rather than applying to jobs that thousands of other people are also applying to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cold-applying to jobs is going to be a worse use of your time than expanding your skill set and meeting people. If you don't work in Python, start working with AI coding tools and build out your GitHub profile in an area that's connected to your specific statistical expertise.
OP here. I do use python and do have GitHub. But these skills are now standard. They are no longer a differentiator.
Anonymous wrote:Most large private sector companies employ "data scientists" ranging from chief data scientists/chief economists (PhD from high caliber university) who go on the news to talk about trends to recent college grads who can manage statistical packages and crunch numbers.
I'm surprised that you don't see your expertise in survey methodology as something related to being a data scientist--but many firms run experiments related to product uptake (ex: which marketing campaign is more successful,) but these aren't big national surveys like I think you may be speaking of.
Anonymous wrote:Cold-applying to jobs is going to be a worse use of your time than expanding your skill set and meeting people. If you don't work in Python, start working with AI coding tools and build out your GitHub profile in an area that's connected to your specific statistical expertise.