Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird take op.
And what makes you think women are being infantilized? Any concrete examples?
Using binkies during sports.
Bikinis are adult, not infant wear.
Pacifiers, footie PJs, etc. are child like and infantizing though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird take op.
And what makes you think women are being infantilized? Any concrete examples?
Using binkies during sports.
Bikinis are adult, not infant wear.
Pacifiers, footie PJs, etc. are child like and infantizing though.
Binkies means pacifiers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird take op.
And what makes you think women are being infantilized? Any concrete examples?
Using binkies during sports.
Bikinis are adult, not infant wear.
Pacifiers, footie PJs, etc. are child like and infantizing though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird take op.
And what makes you think women are being infantilized? Any concrete examples?
Using binkies during sports.
Anonymous wrote:We were at a sports venue recently and were forced to watch a big screen TV with women's flag football on it. The women were using mouth guards that were outside of their mouths, with rings on them. They looked exactly like pacifiers. Can you imagine grown a** male athletes using mouth guards that looked like pacifiers??? It was horrifying. Is that really the only way women's sports can get funded -- if it titillates men? Gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were at a sports venue recently and were forced to watch a big screen TV with women's flag football on it. The women were using mouth guards that were outside of their mouths, with rings on them. They looked exactly like pacifiers. Can you imagine grown a** male athletes using mouth guards that looked like pacifiers??? It was horrifying. Is that really the only way women's sports can get funded -- if it titillates men? Gross.
Huh? this is just a weird trend for both genders. I don't think anyone is doing it to titillate anyone. (one might question why you think its titillating at all)
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/4981514/2024/01/10/mouth-guards-nfl-college-football-fashion/
https://www.distractify.com/p/why-does-dk-metcalf-wear-a-pacifier
Ah! Thank you! I don't watch that much sports so I had never seen athletes using binkies before!!
Anonymous wrote:It's kind of gross that athletes handle their mouthguards during the game. Their hands are repeatedly touching the ground/ball. It's gross.
The ring on the mouthguard is way more sanitary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were at a sports venue recently and were forced to watch a big screen TV with women's flag football on it. The women were using mouth guards that were outside of their mouths, with rings on them. They looked exactly like pacifiers. Can you imagine grown a** male athletes using mouth guards that looked like pacifiers??? It was horrifying. Is that really the only way women's sports can get funded -- if it titillates men? Gross.
Huh? this is just a weird trend for both genders. I don't think anyone is doing it to titillate anyone. (one might question why you think its titillating at all)
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/4981514/2024/01/10/mouth-guards-nfl-college-football-fashion/
https://www.distractify.com/p/why-does-dk-metcalf-wear-a-pacifier
Anonymous wrote:Weird take op.
And what makes you think women are being infantilized? Any concrete examples?
Anonymous wrote:We were at a sports venue recently and were forced to watch a big screen TV with women's flag football on it. The women were using mouth guards that were outside of their mouths, with rings on them. They looked exactly like pacifiers. Can you imagine grown a** male athletes using mouth guards that looked like pacifiers??? It was horrifying. Is that really the only way women's sports can get funded -- if it titillates men? Gross.