Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
This again...how would it be amicable? Nearly every state has blue areas and red areas. There would be dozens or hundreds of armed groups that would try to take advantage of the instability.
Separate the states and the people will follow.
The regular American people would be in 49 of the 50 states and the ultra-wealthy mega-donors controlling our two political parties would be in, let me guess, Hawaii? Is this the split you want? You don't see any way for the American people to retake control of their Federal Government without shipping the toxicity out to Hawaii?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
This again...how would it be amicable? Nearly every state has blue areas and red areas. There would be dozens or hundreds of armed groups that would try to take advantage of the instability.
Separate the states and the people will follow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
This again...how would it be amicable? Nearly every state has blue areas and red areas. There would be dozens or hundreds of armed groups that would try to take advantage of the instability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know about now, but in the recent past, several women in the Senate have been able to work together to get things done.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know about now, but in the recent past, several women in the Senate have been able to work together to get things done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.