Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give me the numbers. I did the calculation on 2-bedroon in my building. Buying was never a better option than renting for me. Long story short, after 30 years, I could buy the unit I rent out cash and the one next door and have money left over.
It isn't even the interest rate. It is about the lost opportunity cost of the down payment and then the extra I would have to pay every month for 30 years. Not to mention, never a chance to downgrade for a year if money gets tight. I'd rather do that than get a roommate.
I know a lot about investing and my returns are very high. Not ready to tie down so much cash. If owning a home teaches you a lot about real estate and upkeep, go for it.
One sometimes overlooked benefit of owning is forced savings. This doesn't apply to you if you are a disciplined saver/investor. But if you are spendy, like my spouse, having money tied up in a home is more good than bad. The equity is significant, and it most likely wouldn't have been spent otherwise. They can max out a 401k, but anything else that hits the account somehow gets spent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buying is almost always better than renting, provided it's a good buy and you take care of it.
People who rent are also often the types who destroy their own things via neglect and bad behaviors, which is why renting is often better for them, despite them never building equity.
Unless you were born with a silver spoon, everyone is a person who rents at some point in their life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buying is almost always better than renting, provided it's a good buy and you take care of it.
People who rent are also often the types who destroy their own things via neglect and bad behaviors, which is why renting is often better for them, despite them never building equity.
What are you talking about?! I have owned and am currently renting after my divorce. I live in a HCOL and the home I can get by renting is much bigger and nicer than if I bought.
Anonymous wrote:Buying is almost always better than renting, provided it's a good buy and you take care of it.
People who rent are also often the types who destroy their own things via neglect and bad behaviors, which is why renting is often better for them, despite them never building equity.
Anonymous wrote:Buying is almost always better than renting, provided it's a good buy and you take care of it.
People who rent are also often the types who destroy their own things via neglect and bad behaviors, which is why renting is often better for them, despite them never building equity.
Anonymous wrote:"better" meaning lower monthly payment? how do you factor in gaining "equity" when you buy?
Anonymous wrote:Give me the numbers. I did the calculation on 2-bedroon in my building. Buying was never a better option than renting for me. Long story short, after 30 years, I could buy the unit I rent out cash and the one next door and have money left over.
It isn't even the interest rate. It is about the lost opportunity cost of the down payment and then the extra I would have to pay every month for 30 years. Not to mention, never a chance to downgrade for a year if money gets tight. I'd rather do that than get a roommate.
I know a lot about investing and my returns are very high. Not ready to tie down so much cash. If owning a home teaches you a lot about real estate and upkeep, go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give me the numbers. I did the calculation on 2-bedroon in my building. Buying was never a better option than renting for me. Long story short, after 30 years, I could buy the unit I rent out cash and the one next door and have money left over.
It isn't even the interest rate. It is about the lost opportunity cost of the down payment and then the extra I would have to pay every month for 30 years. Not to mention, never a chance to downgrade for a year if money gets tight. I'd rather do that than get a roommate.
I know a lot about investing and my returns are very high. Not ready to tie down so much cash. If owning a home teaches you a lot about real estate and upkeep, go for it.
One sometimes overlooked benefit of owning is forced savings. This doesn't apply to you if you are a disciplined saver/investor. But if you are spendy, like my spouse, having money tied up in a home is more good than bad. The equity is significant, and it most likely wouldn't have been spent otherwise. They can max out a 401k, but anything else that hits the account somehow gets spent.
Anonymous wrote:Give me the numbers. I did the calculation on 2-bedroon in my building. Buying was never a better option than renting for me. Long story short, after 30 years, I could buy the unit I rent out cash and the one next door and have money left over.
It isn't even the interest rate. It is about the lost opportunity cost of the down payment and then the extra I would have to pay every month for 30 years. Not to mention, never a chance to downgrade for a year if money gets tight. I'd rather do that than get a roommate.
I know a lot about investing and my returns are very high. Not ready to tie down so much cash. If owning a home teaches you a lot about real estate and upkeep, go for it.