Anonymous wrote:I’m not on twitter but wasn’t it common to block someone on Twitter if they were being obnoxious, disruptive or bullying? Seems likely that’s what happened here. I get a public entity is different than a private one but they should still be able to block users who are disruptive or harassing.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not on twitter but wasn’t it common to block someone on Twitter if they were being obnoxious, disruptive or bullying? Seems likely that’s what happened here. I get a public entity is different than a private one but they should still be able to block users who are disruptive or harassing.
Anonymous wrote:Why does someone who doesn’t work for MCPS or have children who attend MCPS need access to an MCPS staff group page? There are plenty of teacher resource groups protected through membership walls. I don’t get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, there was like a Facebook group or something for LGBTQ educators, and Mandel (who is neither LGBTQ nor an MCPS staff member) wanted access?
That's weird. She's weird. I think MCPS did the right thing by protecting their staff.
She is weird - but you cannot have a public page for your staff and then block some members of the public based on their political beliefs. That said blocking them from coming to the school board meeting was the bigger issue.
Got it. In general, I think Mandel is a virulent homophobe and bully who should not be allowed anywhere near children who are not her own, but I see the point about having a public page. For some reason the Bethesda Magazine article isn't loading for me, but what was the topic of the school board meeting? It kind of seems like MCPS was trying to protect staff from someone who sought to do them harm (which I appreciate), and it's interesting that the judge threw out the part of the case about the school board meeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, there was like a Facebook group or something for LGBTQ educators, and Mandel (who is neither LGBTQ nor an MCPS staff member) wanted access?
That's weird. She's weird. I think MCPS did the right thing by protecting their staff.
She is weird - but you cannot have a public page for your staff and then block some members of the public based on their political beliefs. That said blocking them from coming to the school board meeting was the bigger issue.
Anonymous wrote:So, there was like a Facebook group or something for LGBTQ educators, and Mandel (who is neither LGBTQ nor an MCPS staff member) wanted access?
That's weird. She's weird. I think MCPS did the right thing by protecting their staff.
Yes.Anonymous wrote:Is this Steven Miller’s America First?
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) recently reached a $125,000 settlement in a lawsuit filed by two county residents over alleged violations of the First Amendment, according to statements from MCPS and lawyers for the county residents.
The suit, filed by America First Legal (AFL), alleged that MCPS violated the rights of Matthew Foldi, a reporter for The Spectator, and conservative commentator Bethany Mandel, by preventing them from attending a 2023 county school board meeting in person, and by blocking them from accessing an LGBTQ+ MCPS staff affinity group social media page. In September, a federal judge dismissed two of the three allegations in the case, leaving the claim concerning access to the LGBTQ+ staff affinity group social media page.