Anonymous wrote:OP:
160 million federal tax payers would stop having to pay and subsidize the health care of nearly 11 million Americans.
Why should they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
You’re right. I can’t count the number of times I’ve scheduled needless medical appoints just because I have health insurance and a $35 copay. /s
Your ignorance is showing. Pay $150 minimum to go anywhere. And yes I skip appointments that I would go to if they were free. Were you even aware that some of us, with health insurance we pay through the nose for, still have to pay that much to see a doctor?
DP.
Free to who? Nothing is free.
Copays are there so people create a value proposition in their minds if it's really worth going to the doctor after they stubbed their toe.
Anonymous wrote:OP:
160 million federal tax payers would stop having to pay and subsidize the health care of nearly 11 million Americans.
Why should they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
You’re right. I can’t count the number of times I’ve scheduled needless medical appoints just because I have health insurance and a $35 copay. /s
Your ignorance is showing. Pay $150 minimum to go anywhere. And yes I skip appointments that I would go to if they were free. Were you even aware that some of us, with health insurance we pay through the nose for, still have to pay that much to see a doctor?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
You’re right. I can’t count the number of times I’ve scheduled needless medical appoints just because I have health insurance and a $35 copay. /s
including 1.4 million undocumented residents who get coverage through state-funded programs
Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
Anonymous wrote:We’d all like free healthcare. Oh well. I don’t buy the argument that all these people will end up in the ER. Some of the care is likely unnecessary and they just get it because it’s free.
If you want to talk affordable healthcare for ALL, not tied to employment, then we can talk about a sliding scale where some don’t pay.
Anonymous wrote:We pay thus in terms of hospitals raising prices because they still will treat them (and likely more with far more expensive care now that these folks won't get primary medical care) but not get reimbursed.
But if we pay higher prices to healthcare orgs, I guess that makes people happy?