Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an older guy, I really like women's softball.
I think part of it is that my mother was a great athlete without enough sports to play in her day. But also part of it is the great level of coordination and athleticism of the athletes. The strategy component is fascinating, too, and 7 innings is the right amount of time to watch a game.
So in the finals tonight I observed something I have never seen. Texas Tech's pitcher, a transfer from Stanford who has proven to be virtually unhittable, was asked to throw an intentional walk to Texas's Reese Atwood, a six foot tall catcher (!) with a fearsome swing and a rocket arm. Canady the pitcher is so dominant she is rarely called upon to throw intentional walks, and sure enough, after three pitches that were a little too close to the strike zone, Atwood hits the fourth pitch notionally intended to be an intentional ball for a two run single to win the game. Texas Tech's fielders were not anticipating a ball being put into play. Those two runs won the game.
In any event, kudos to the women for providing great sports entertainment. NCAA D1 competition is very serious stuff and not for everyone, but if these games encourage women and girls to get involved in the game, I think it a great thing.
I was surprised how bad the intentional balls were. Why are they so close the strike zone? I don't watch softball but based on a replay of the hit that would have been a strike in baseball and therefore completely in the zone of any athletes as good as these to hit and hit where they want it to go regardless of whether it's softball or baseball. Is it common for intential walks in softball to look like those pitches?
Kudos to the hitter--I feel bad for Canady.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter played HS softball, and we watched college games and I agree that softball is really fun -- what baseball should be, with faster play, a shorter game, more infield action and closer plays.
The one thing that I don't like about softball is that a team can run with one good pitcher for a whole series or season, so a team can go really really far if they have just one awesome pitcher. You don't see that in baseball where you need to have a rotation and a relief bench, etc.
THe other down side to softball (for parents and kids out there) is that from ages 8-11 or so it's pretty miserable. The softballs are heavy, the girls don't have the arm strength to really throw the ball cross field, and the pitching is really tough to get a handle on without significant coaching and training. So there's a period of years where it can be truly miserable to watch and play, and a lot of girls drop out then because it's a lot of standing around while the batter gets walked, and then errors all around the field. Baseball also has some of this at that age, but it's way worse for softball.
Anonymous wrote:Can TT get pitching like that again tomorrow? Great game.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if I can keep my eyes open to the end of this one. Let's go Texas Tech, keep pouring it on, I want a finale tomorrow.
Anonymous wrote:As an older guy, I really like women's softball.
I think part of it is that my mother was a great athlete without enough sports to play in her day. But also part of it is the great level of coordination and athleticism of the athletes. The strategy component is fascinating, too, and 7 innings is the right amount of time to watch a game.
So in the finals tonight I observed something I have never seen. Texas Tech's pitcher, a transfer from Stanford who has proven to be virtually unhittable, was asked to throw an intentional walk to Texas's Reese Atwood, a six foot tall catcher (!) with a fearsome swing and a rocket arm. Canady the pitcher is so dominant she is rarely called upon to throw intentional walks, and sure enough, after three pitches that were a little too close to the strike zone, Atwood hits the fourth pitch notionally intended to be an intentional ball for a two run single to win the game. Texas Tech's fielders were not anticipating a ball being put into play. Those two runs won the game.
In any event, kudos to the women for providing great sports entertainment. NCAA D1 competition is very serious stuff and not for everyone, but if these games encourage women and girls to get involved in the game, I think it a great thing.