Well a woman who required lifesaving care due to pregnancy is probably not going to get pregnant again. So if she is no longer a baby machine, what good is she to the GOP?

Anonymous wrote:They were lying?!? Never……!

It’s always lies.

There is no change in hospital requirements. In states with abortion bans, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires hospitals to provide abortion care if it's necessary to stabilize a patient's condition during a medical emergency. This federal law generally takes precedence over state laws, including those that ban abortion, when a patient's life or health is at risk. Period. This is just more liberal melodrama.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

Because the woman's death is God's will. The baby doesn't have to die, too.

Blessed be the fruit.

/s





RIP Adriana Smith
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/03/nx-s1-5416784/controversy-grows-over-case-of-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-kept-on-life-support

I read the article. The grandma wants the baby to be born. I hadn’t thought of that angle. This whole thing is tragic and cruel but if the baby does live, I feel better knowing the baby will be wanted and the grandmother will find some peace in that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

None of you people obsessed with “protecting women” have an answer for this one?

Because none of them really care about anyone or have a brain in their head. Every woman I know that voted MAGA did not go to college-every one of them. Every male I know that is MAGA is a racist, misogynistic, homophobic, controlling a@@. MAGA is the most uneducated, uncaring, and hateful group pf people out there.

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care about any women, even Republican women.

This and all these women being good little wives voting like their husband against their daughters and all women's health make me sick. Love the ones say but Trump was better than Kamala. No he was not and is NOT!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

Because the woman's death is God's will. The baby doesn't have to die, too.

Blessed be the fruit.

/s





RIP Adriana Smith
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/03/nx-s1-5416784/controversy-grows-over-case-of-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-kept-on-life-support

May the Lord open.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

Because the woman's death is God's will. The baby doesn't have to die, too.

Blessed be the fruit.

/s





RIP Adriana Smith
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/03/nx-s1-5416784/controversy-grows-over-case-of-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-kept-on-life-support

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

Because the woman's death is God's will. The baby doesn't have to die, too.

They were lying?!? Never……!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

None of you people obsessed with “protecting women” have an answer for this one?

The previous guidance from the Biden administration does not “reflect the policy of this Administration,” according to an announcement of the policy change.

CMS added that it will continue to enforce the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, known as EMTALA, and it specified that the policy included “identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.”

CMS still applies so calm down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

None of you people obsessed with “protecting women” have an answer for this one?

Anonymous wrote:This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Why would state law ban an abortion when the pregnancy is killing the woman?

This is about EMTALA, claiming that federal law requires abortions where state law bans it.

Republicans don't care about any women, even Republican women.

Hey remember when MAGA was claiming that when doctors were letting women die instead of giving lifesaving care, they were just doing it to make Republicans look bad, and of course Republicans want doctors to perform emergency abortions to save the life of the mother?

Guess what? They were lying.

Trump removes guidance instructing doctors to save pregnant women's lives:

https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/trump-revokes-guidelines-directing-hospitals-1187803