Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Why? These Trump appointees keep voting against Trump, unlike Thomas and Alito.

Well, ACB does.

Or sometimes she recuses herself, which in Trump's book is the worst thing ever.

+1. I didn’t think I’d ever respect her. But, she’s growing on me. Both with her recusal and her pushing back in oral arguments. P

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.

Sotomayor is not in poor health. Certainly not like RBG was.

Her father died in his 40’s.

And that matters...

As a physician I would answer in the affirmative.

She’s diabetic. If that’s why her father died, I’d argue that her compliance with treatment and the availability of much better treatment than existed back then matters a lot.

Imagine 2 more conservative judges in their late 40’s. If Sotomayor is replaced they’ll have ghost gun vending machines in schools by 2030.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Why? These Trump appointees keep voting against Trump, unlike Thomas and Alito.

Well, ACB does.

It was 7-2 in an Alien Enemies Act 'case', when there wasn't even a case to act on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Why? These Trump appointees keep voting against Trump, unlike Thomas and Alito.

Well, ACB does.

Or sometimes she recuses herself, which in Trump's book is the worst thing ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Why? These Trump appointees keep voting against Trump, unlike Thomas and Alito.

Well, ACB does.

Anonymous wrote:The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Why? These Trump appointees keep voting against Trump, unlike Thomas and Alito.

Type 1 diabetics diagnosed prior to age 10 can have a lower life expectancy.

Type 1 diabetics can have life expectancies 10-12 years shorter than the general population. The average is 6 years.

The prospect of a court including six Trump appointees plus John "Don't FOIA DOGE" Roberts...truly frightening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.

Sotomayor is not in poor health. Certainly not like RBG was.

Her father died in his 40’s.

And that matters...

As a physician I would answer in the affirmative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.

Sotomayor is not in poor health. Certainly not like RBG was.

Her father died in his 40’s.

And that matters...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.

Sotomayor is not in poor health. Certainly not like RBG was.

Her father died in his 40’s.

Anonymous wrote:Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.

Sotomayor is not in poor health. Certainly not like RBG was.

Who cares? The US is going to come apart anyway.

Thomas is 77 and Alito is 76. I have to believe they step aside during Trump 2.0. The wildcard is Sotomayor. She’s 69 but in poor health.