Anonymous wrote:Eve is good because it has an unambiguous spelling and kpronunciation in English.
The other names you reference do have ambiguities.
I just had a situation where someone at work told me to e-mail a contact that I heard as "Ava". But it turned out to be "Eva". They say Ayvah for that name and I say Eevah.
I think it's always better to have a name that people can spell and pronounce accurately. I think it's a mistake to name American kids names like Siobhan. All cultures have shorter and easier names - I welcome names from a variety of cultures. I just feel bad watching the train wrecks of people dealing with people who can't say their name. I've also lived and worked abroad and allowed people to give me nicknames that work for them. I actually like that. However, at times these days, I've even seen that getting people's names wrong is a micro aggression. So make it easy for everybody to succeed.
P.S. I thought Andrew would be unique in a sea of Brayden/Jaydens/Haydens but there were 5 in his kindergarten class. Sometimes luck is not on your side.
Anonymous wrote:We didn’t think about similar sounding names when naming our kids, but did aim for names that were not top 50. One of our sons’ names ends in -on, which we’ve discovered is a really popular trend (Carson, Hudson, Landon, Jackson, etc.). DH wishes we’d picked a different name, but honestly, I’m not bothered. There still aren’t too many -on names in his class. DD, however, has 6 girls in her class whose names rhyme/end in -a (Isla, Lyla, Kyra). I do think one be annoyed if DD was one of them!
Anonymous wrote:It’s a terrible name. If she’s at all a tomboy or lesbian she’ll get called Steve, if she’s unpopular she’ll get called Leave, and it leaves zero room for any variation. As someone with a name like that it stinks. I have a short, stumpy ugly name too. Always hated it.
Anonymous wrote:Eve is good because it has an unambiguous spelling and pronunciation in English.
The other names you reference do have ambiguities.
I just had a situation where someone at work told me to e-mail a contact that I heard as "Ava". But it turned out to be "Eva". They say Ayvah for that name and I say Eevah.
I think it's always better to have a name that people can spell and pronounce accurately. I think it's a mistake to name American kids names like Siobhan. All cultures have shorter and easier names - I welcome names from a variety of cultures. I just feel bad watching the train wrecks of people dealing with people who can't say their name. I've also lived and worked abroad and allowed people to give me nicknames that work for them. I actually like that. However, at times these days, I've even seen that getting people's names wrong is a micro aggression. So make it easy for everybody to succeed.
P.S. I thought Andrew would be unique in a sea of Brayden/Jaydens/Haydens but there were 5 in his kindergarten class. Sometimes luck is not on your side.
Anonymous wrote:I think you're overthinking it and you should use Eve. It's a lovely name, and not over used.
Yes, Evelyn is popular right now, but I don't think people shorten Evelyn to Eve, because they're different vowel sounds. Same with Evangeline (which isn't very popular to begin with.)
Naming is so much more varied now than when we were kids. Even names in the top 10 aren't repeated as often as you'd think.